Journal list menu
Individual variation creates diverse migratory portfolios in native populations of a mountain ungulate
Corresponding Author
B. Lowrey
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorD. E. McWhirter
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, 83001 USA
Search for more papers by this authorK. M. Proffitt
Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Bozeman, Montana, 59718 USA
Search for more papers by this authorK. L. Monteith
Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, 82072 USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. B. Courtemanch
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, 83001 USA
Search for more papers by this authorP. J. White
Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service, Mammoth, Wyoming, 82190 USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. T. Paterson
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
Search for more papers by this authorS. R. Dewey
Grand Teton National Park, National Park Service, PO Box 170, Moose, Wyoming, 83012 USA
Search for more papers by this authorR. A. Garrott
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
B. Lowrey
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorD. E. McWhirter
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, 83001 USA
Search for more papers by this authorK. M. Proffitt
Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks, Bozeman, Montana, 59718 USA
Search for more papers by this authorK. L. Monteith
Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, 82072 USA
Search for more papers by this authorA. B. Courtemanch
Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, 83001 USA
Search for more papers by this authorP. J. White
Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service, Mammoth, Wyoming, 82190 USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ. T. Paterson
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
Search for more papers by this authorS. R. Dewey
Grand Teton National Park, National Park Service, PO Box 170, Moose, Wyoming, 83012 USA
Search for more papers by this authorR. A. Garrott
Fish and Wildlife Ecology and Management Program, Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, 59717 USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Ecological theory and empirical studies have demonstrated population-level demographic benefits resulting from a diversity of migratory behaviors with important implications for ecology, conservation, and evolution of migratory organisms. Nevertheless, evaluation of migratory portfolios (i.e., the variation in migratory behaviors across space and time among individuals within populations) has received relatively little attention in migratory ungulates, where research has focused largely on the dichotomous behaviors (e.g., resident and migrant) of partially migratory populations. Using GPS data from 361 female bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) across 17 (4 restored, 6 augmented, 7 native) populations in Montana and Wyoming, USA, we (1) characterized migratory portfolios based on behavioral and spatial migratory characteristics and (2) evaluated the relative influence of landscape attributes and management histories on migratory diversity. Native populations, which had been extant on the landscape for many generations, had more diverse migratory portfolios, higher behavioral switching rates, reduced seasonal range fidelity, and broad dispersion of individuals across summer and winter ranges. In contrast, restored populations with an abbreviated history on the landscape were largely non-migratory with a narrow portfolio of migratory behaviors, less behavioral switching, higher fidelity to seasonal ranges, and less dispersion on summer and winter ranges. Augmented populations were more variable and contained characteristics of both native and restored populations. Differences in migratory diversity among populations were associated with management histories (e.g., restored, augmented, or native). Landscape characteristics such as the duration and regularity of green-up, human landscape alterations, topography, and snow gradients were not strongly associated with migratory diversity. We suggest a two-pronged approach to restoring migratory portfolios in ungulates that first develops behavior-specific habitat models and then places individuals with known migratory behaviors into unoccupied areas in an effort to bolster migratory portfolios in restored populations, potentially with synergistic benefits associated with variation among individuals and resulting portfolio effects. Management efforts to restore diverse migratory portfolios may increase the abundance, resilience, and long-term viability of ungulate populations.
Open Research
Data Availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available via the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.80gb5mknj
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
eap2106-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdfPDF document, 5.3 MB | Appendix S1 |
eap2106-sup-0002-AppendixS2.pdfPDF document, 81.8 KB | Appendix S2 |
eap2106-sup-0003-AppendixS3.pdfPDF document, 1.2 MB | Appendix S3 |
eap2106-sup-0004-AppendixS4.pdfPDF document, 423.8 KB | Appendix S4 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Literature cited
- Aikens, E. O., M. J. Kauffman, J. A. Merkle, S. P. H. Dwinnell, G. L. Fralick, and K. L. Monteith. 2017. The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. Ecology Letters 20: 741–750.
- Barker, K. J., M. S. Mitchell, K. M. Proffitt, and J. D. Devoe. 2018. Land management alters traditional nutritional benefits of migration for elk. Journal of Wildlife Management 83: 167–174.
- Barker, K. J., M. S. Mitchell, and K. M. Proffitt. 2019. Native forage mediates influence of irrigated agriculture on migratory behavior of elk. Journal of Animal Ecology 88: 1100–1110.
- Berger, J.. 1990. Persistence of different-sized populations: An empirical assessment of rapid extinctions in bighorn sheep. Conservation Biology 4: 91–98.
- Bischof, R., L. E. Loe, E. L. Meisingset, B. Zimmermann, B. van Moorter, and A. Mysterud. 2012. A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? American Naturalist 180: 407–424.
- Bunnefeld, N., L. Börger, B. van Moorter, C. M. Rolandsen, H. Dettki, E. J. Solberg, and G. Ericsson. 2011. A model-driven approach to quantify migration patterns: individual, regional and yearly differences. Journal of Animal Ecology 80: 466–476.
- Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York, New York, USA.
- Butler, C. J., et al. 2018. Respiratory pathogens and their association with population performance in Montana and Wyoming bighorn sheep populations. PLoS Biology 13:e0207780.
- Cagnacci, F., et al. 2011. Partial migration in roe deer: migratory and resident tactics are end points of a behavioral gradient determined by ecological factors. Oikos 120: 1790–1802.
- Cassirer, E. F., et al. 2017. Pneumonia in bighorn sheep: risk and resilience. Journal of Wildlife Management 82: 32–45.
- Courtemanch, A. B., M. J. Kauffman, S. Kilpatrick, and S. R. Dewey. 2017. Alternative foraging strategies enable a mountain ungulate to persist after migration loss. Ecosphere 8: 1–16.
- D'eon, R. G., and D. Delparte. 2005. Effects of radio-collar position and orientation on GPS radio-collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening, Journal of Applied Ecology. 42: 383–388.
- DeCesare, N. J., M. Hebblewhite, H. S. Robinson, and M. Musiani. 2009. Endangered, apparently: the role of apparent competition in endangered species conservation: Apparent competition and endangered species. Animal Conservation 13: 353–362.
- Dingle, H., and V. A. Drake. 2007. What is migration? BioScience 57: 113–121.
- Eggeman, S. L., M. Hebblewhite, H. Bohm, J. Whittington, and E. H. Merrill. 2016. Behavioral flexibility in migratory behavior in a long-lived large herbivore. Journal of Animal Ecology 85: 785–797.
- Elbroch, L. M., and H. U. Wittmer. 2013. The effects of puma prey selection and specialization on less abundant prey in Patagonia. Journal of Mammalogy 94: 259–268.
- Festa-Bianchet, M., T. Coulson, J.-M. Gaillard, J. T. Hogg, and F. Pelletier. 2006. Stochastic predation events and population persistence in bighorn sheep. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 1537–1543.
- Finch, T., S. J. Butler, A. M. A. Franco, and W. Cresswell. 2016. Low migratory connectivity is common in long-distance migrant birds. Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 662–673.
- Fryxell, J. M.. 1991. Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivores. American Naturalist 138: 478–498.
- Fryxell, J. M., and A. R. E. Sinclair. 1988. Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 3: 237–241.
- Geist, V. 1971. Mountain sheep: a study in behavior and evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
- Gilroy, J. J., J. A. Gill, S. H. M. Butchart, V. R. Jones, and A. M. A. Franco. 2016. Migratory diversity predicts population declines in birds. Ecology Letters 19: 308–317.
- Hebblewhite, M., and E. H. Merrill. 2009. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90: 3445–3454.
- Hijmans, R. J.2017. raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.6-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster
- Hsiung, A. C., W. A. Boyle, R. J. Cooper, and R. B. Chandler. 2018. Altitudinal migration: ecological drivers, knowledge gaps, and conservation implications. Biological Reviews 93: 2049–2070.
- Jain, A. K.. 2010. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern Recognition Letters 31: 651–666.
- Jakopak, R. P., T. N. Lasharr, S. P. H. Dwinnell, G. L. Fralick, and K. L. Monteith. 2019. Rapid acquisition of memory in a complex landscape by a mule deer. Ecology 100:e02857. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2854
- Jesmer, B. R., et al. 2018. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361: 1023–1025.
- Johnson, H. E., L. S. Mills, J. D. Wehausen, T. R. Stephenson, and G. Luikart. 2011. Translating effects of inbreeding depression on component vital rates to overall population growth in endangered bighorn sheep. Conservation Biology 25: 1240–1249.
- Johnson, H. E., M. Hebblewhite, T. R. Stephenson, D. W. German, B. M. Pierce, and V. C. Bleich. 2013. Evaluating apparent competition in limiting the recovery of an endangered ungulate. Oecologia 171: 295–307.
- Jorgensen, S. J., N. S. Arnoldi, E. E. Estess, T. K. Chapple, M. Rückert, S. D. Anderson, and B. A. Block. 2012. Eating or meeting? Cluster analysis reveals intricacies of white shark (Carcharodon carcharias) migration and offshore behavior. PLoS ONE 7:e47819.
- Kassambara, A., and F. Mundt. 2017. factoextra: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R package version 1:5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra
- Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological methodology. Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, California, USA.
- Lowrey, B., R. A. Garrott, D. E. McWhirter, P. J. White, N. J. DeCesare, and S. T. Stewart. 2018. Niche similarities among introduced and native mountain ungulates. Ecological Applications 28: 1131–1142.
- Lowrey, B., et al. 2019. Characterizing population and individual migration patterns among native and restored bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Ecology and Evolution 9: 8829–8839.
- Lula, E. S., B. Lowrey, K. M. Proffitt, A. R. Litt, J. A. Cunningham, C. J. Butler, and R. A. Garrott. In press. Is habitat constraining bighorn sheep restoration? A case study. Journal of Wildlife Management 84: 588–600.
- Manlove, K. R., E. F. Cassirer, R. K. Plowright, P. C. Cross, and P. J. Hudson. 2017. Contact and contagion: bighorn sheep demographic states vary in probability of transmission given contact. Journal of Animal Ecology 86: 908–920.
- Markowitz, H.. 1952. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance 7: 77–91.
- Martin, J., et al. 2018. Common drivers of seasonal movements on the migration—residency behavior continuum in a large herbivore. Scientific Reports 8: 7631.
- Merkle, J. A., K. L. Monteith, E. O. Aikens, M. M. Hayes, K. R. Hersey, A. D. Middleton, B. A. Oates, H. Sawyer, B. M. Scurlock, and M. J. Kauffman. 2016. Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 283: 20160456.
- Merkle, J. A., H. Sawyer, K. L. Monteith, S. P. H. Dwinnell, G. L. Fralick, and M. J. Kauffman. 2019. Spatial memory shapes migration and its benefits: evidence from a large herbivore. Ecology Letters 22: 1797–1805.
- Middleton, A. D., M. J. Kauffman, D. E. McWhirter, J. G. Cook, R. C. Cook, A. A. Nelson, M. D. Jimenez, and R. W. Klaver. 2013. Animal migration amid shifting patterns of phenology and predation: lessons from a Yellowstone elk herd. Ecology 94: 1245–1256.
- Middleton, A. D., J. A. Merkle, D. E. McWhirter, J. G. Cook, R. C. Cook, P. J. White, and M. J. Kauffman. 2018. Green-wave surfing increases fat gain in a migratory ungulate. Oikos 127: 1060–1068.
- Monteith, K. L., M. M. Hayes, M. J. Kauffman, H. E. Copeland, and H. Sawyer. 2018. Functional attributes of ungulate migration: landscape features facilitate movement and access to forage. Ecological Applications 28: 2153–2164.
- Morrison, T. A., W. A. Link, W. D. Newmark, C. A. H. Foley, and D. T. Bolger. 2016. Tarangire revisited: consequences of declining connectivity in a tropical ungulate population. Biological Conservation 197: 53–60.
- MTFWP. 2013. Draft environmental impact statement assessment for the potential reintroduction of bighorn sheep into Indian or Wolf creek, Madison mountain range. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana, USA. http://fwp.mt.gov/news/publicNotices/environmentalAssessments/developmentImprovementsAndEnhancements/pn_0319.html
- Mueller, T., et al. 2011. How landscape dynamics link individual- to population-level movement patterns: a multispecies comparison of ungulate relocation data. Global Ecology and Biogeography 20: 683–694.
- Mysterud, A., E. L. Leif, B. Zimmermann, R. Bischof, V. Veiberg, and E. Meisingset. 2011. Partial migration in expanding red deer populations at northern latitudes—a role for density dependence? Oikos 120: 1817–1825.
- NOHRSC 2004. National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS) data products at NSIDC. National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
- Pebesma, E.2018. sf: simple features for R. R package version 0.6-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sf
- R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
- Rickbeil, G. J. M., et al. 2019. Plasticity in elk migration timing is a response to changing environmental conditions. Global Change Biology 25: 2368–2381.
- Rolandsen, C. M., E. J. Solberg, B. E. Sæther, B. V. Moorter, I. Herfindal, and K. Bjørneraas. 2016. On fitness and partial migration in a large herbivore—migratory moose have higher reproductive performance than residents. Oikos 126: 547–555.
- Rominger, E. M., H. A. Whitlaw, D. L. Weybright, W. C. Dunn, and W. B. Ballard. 2004. The influence of mountain lion predation on bighorn sheep translocations. Journal of Wildlife Management 68: 993–999.
- Sawyer, H., A. D. Middleton, M. M. Hayes, M. J. Kauffman, and K. L. Monteith. 2016. The extra mile: ungulate migration distance alters the use of seasonal range and exposure to anthropogenic risk. Ecosphere 7: 1–11.
- Schindler, D. E., R. Hilborn, B. Chasco, C. P. Boatright, T. P. Quinn, L. A. Rogers, and M. S. Webster. 2010. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465: 609–612.
- Sells, S. N., M. S. Mitchell, J. J. Nowak, P. M. Lukacs, N. J. Anderson, J. M. Ramsey, J. A. Gude, and P. R. Krausman. 2015. Modeling risk of pneumonia epizootics in bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management 79: 195–210.
- Singh, N. J., L. Börger, H. Dettki, N. Bunnefeld, and G. Ericsson. 2012. From migration to nomadism: movement variability in a northern ungulate across its latitudinal range. Ecological Applications 22: 2007–2020.
- Singh, N. J., A. M. Allen, and G. Ericsson. 2016. Quantifying migration behaviour using net squared displacement approach: clarifications and caveats. PLoS ONE 11:e0149594.
- Spitz, D. B., M. Hebblewhite, and T. R. Stephenson. 2017. “MigrateR”: extending model-driven methods for classifying and quantifying animal movement behavior. Ecography 40: 788–799.
- Spitz, D. B., M. Hebblewhite, T. R. Stephenson, and D. German. 2018. How plastic is migratory behavior? Quantifying elevational movement in a partially-migratory alpine ungulate. Canadian Journal of Zoology 96: 1385–1394.
- Tucker, M. A., et al. 2018. Moving in the Anthropocene: global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359: 466–469.
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Recovery plan for the Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep. California/Nevada Operations Office, Sacramento, California, USA.
- Webster, M. S., and P. P. Marra 2005. The importance of understanding migratory connectivity and seasonal interactions. Pages 199–209 in R. Greenberg, and P. P. Marra, editors. Birds of two worlds: the ecology and evolution of migration. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
- Webster, M. S., P. P. Marra, S. M. Haig, S. Bensch, and R. T. Holmes. 2002. Links between worlds: unraveling migratory connectivity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 76–83.
- White, K. S., N. L. Barten, S. Crouse, and J. Crouse. 2014. Benefits of migration in relation to nutritional condition and predation risk in a partially migratory moose population. Ecology 95: 225–237.
- Whitfield, M. B. 1983. Bighorn sheep history, distributions and habitat relationships in the Teton Mountain Range, Wyoming. Thesis. Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho, USA.
- Wilcove, D. S., and M. Wikelski. 2008. Going, going, gone: is animal migration disappearing? PLoS Biology 6:e188.
- Wilson, R. R., L. S. Parrett, K. Joly, and J. R. Dau. 2016. Effects of roads on individual caribou movements during migration. Biological Conservation 195: 2–8.
- WYGF. 1980. Bighorn sheep Darby Mountain job completion report. Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Jackson, Wyoming, USA.
- Yang, L., et al. 2018. A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146: 108–123.