Journal list menu
Maintenance of high diversity in mechanistic forest dynamics models of competition for light
Corresponding Author
Matteo Detto
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Correspondence
Matteo Detto
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan M. Levine
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorStephen W. Pacala
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Matteo Detto
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Correspondence
Matteo Detto
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan M. Levine
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorStephen W. Pacala
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
Search for more papers by this authorHandling Editor: Anthony W. D'Amato
Abstract
Although early theoretical work suggests that competition for light erodes successional diversity in forests, verbal models and recent numerical work with complex mechanistic forest simulators suggest that disturbance in such systems can maintain successional diversity. Nonetheless, if and how allocation trade-offs between competitors interact with disturbance to maintain high diversity in successional systems remains poorly understood. Here, using mechanistic and analytically tractable models, we show that a theoretically unlimited number of coexisting species can be maintained by allocational trade-offs such as investing in light-harvesting organs versus height growth, investing in reproduction versus growth or survival versus growth. The models describe the successional dynamics of a forest composed of many patches subjected to random or periodic disturbance, and are consistent with physiologically mechanistic terrestrial ecosystem models, including the terrestrial components of recent Earth System Models. We show that coexistence arises in our models because species specialize in the successional time they best exploit the light environment and convert resources into seeds or contribute to advance regeneration. We also show that our results are relevant to non-forested ecosystems by demonstrating the emergence of similar dynamics in a mechanistic model of competition for light among annual plant species. Finally, we show that coexistence in our models is relatively robust to the introduction of intraspecific variability that weakens the competitive hierarchy caused by asymmetric competition for light.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
No data were collected. Code is available in the supplementary material.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ecm1500-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pdfPDF document, 2 MB | Appendix S1 |
ecm1500-sup-0002-DataS1.zipapplication/x-zip-compressed, 127.1 KB | Data S1 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Adler, F., and J. Mosquera. 2000. “Is Space Necessary Interference Competition and Limits to Biodiversity.” Ecology 81: 3226–32.
- Arora, V.K., and G.J. Boer. 2006. “Simulating Competition and Coexistence between Plant Functional Types in a Dynamic Vegetation Model.” Earth Interactions 10: 1–30.
- Barabás, G., and R. D'Andrea. 2016. “The Effect of Intraspecific Variation and Heritability on Community Pattern and Robustness.” Ecology Letters 19: 977–86.
- Barot, S., and J. Gignoux. 2004. “Mechanisms Promoting Plant Coexistence: Can all the Proposed Processes Be Reconciled?” Oikos 106: 185–92.
- Bolnick, D.I., R. Svanbäck, J.A. Fordyce, L.H. Yang, J.M. Davis, C.D. Hulsey, and M.L. Forister. 2003. “The Ecology of Individuals: Incidence and Implications of Individual Specialization.” American Naturalist 161: 1–28.
- Bongers, F., L. Poorter, W.D. Hawthorne, and D. Sheil. 2009. “The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis Applies to Tropical Forests, but Disturbance Contributes Little to Tree Diversity.” Ecology Letters 12: 798–805.
- Botkin, D. 1993. Forest dynamics: An Ecological Model. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Canham, C.D. 1985. “Suppression and Release during Canopy Recruitment in Acer saccharum Author.” Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 112: 134–45.
- Chesson, P. 2000a. “General Theory of Competitive Coexistence in Spatially-Varying Environments.” Theoretical Population Biology 58: 211–37.
- Chesson, P. 2000b. “Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343–66.
- Connell, J.H. 1978. “Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs.” Science 199: 1302–10.
- Dietze, M., and A. Latimer. 2012. “ Forest Simulators.” In Encyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology, edited by A. Hastings and L.J. Gross, 307–16. London: University of California Press.
- Ellner, S.P., R.E. Snyder, and P.B. Adler. 2016. “How to quantify the temporal storage effect using simulations instead of math.” Ecology Letters 19: 1333–42.
- Ellner, S.P., R.E. Snyder, P.B. Adler, and G. Hooker. 2019. “An expanded modern coexistence theory for empirical applications.” Ecology Letters 22: 3–18.
- Falster, D.S., Å. Brännström, M. Westoby, and U. Dieckmann. 2017. “Multitrait Successional Forest Dynamics Enable Diverse Competitive Coexistence.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 114: E2719–28.
- Farrior, C.E., S.A. Bohlman, S. Hubbell, and S.W. Pacala. 2016. “Dominance of the Suppressed: Power-Law Size Structure in Tropical Forests.” Science 351: 155–7.
- Fisher, R.A., and C.D. Koven. 2020. “Perspectives on the Future of Land Surface Models and the Challenges of Representing Complex Terrestrial Systems.” Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2018ms001453
- Geritz, S.A. 1995. “Evolutionarily Stable Seed Polymorphism and Small-Scale Spatial Variation in Seedling Density.” American Naturalist 146: 685–707.
- Godoy, O., and J.M. Levine. 2014. “Phenology Effects on Invasion Success: Insights from Coupling Field Experiments to Coexistence Theory.” Ecology 95: 726–36.
- Going, B.M., J. Hillerislambers, and J.M. Levine. 2009. “Abiotic and Biotic Resistance to Grass Invasion in Serpentine Annual Plant Communities.” Oecologia 159: 839–47.
- Gravel, D., C.D. Canham, M. Beaudet, and C. Messier. 2010. “Shade Tolerance, Canopy Gaps and Mechanisms of Coexistence of Forest Trees.” Oikos 119: 475–84.
- Grubb, P.J. 1977. “The Maintenance of Species-Richness in Plant Communities: The Importance of the Regeneration Niche.” Biological Reviews 52: 107–45.
- Hara, T. 1993. “Effects of Variation in Individual Growth on Plant Species Coexistence.” Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 409–16.
- Hart, S.P., S.J. Schreiber, and J.M. Levine. 2016. “How Variation between Individuals Affects Species Coexistence.” Ecology Letters 19: 825–38.
- Harte, J., A. Kinzig, and J. Green. 1999. “Self-Similarity in the Distribution and Abundance of Species.” Science 284: 334–6.
- Horn, H.S. 1974. “The Ecology of Secondary Succession.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 25–37.
10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.000325 Google Scholar
- Horn, H.S. 1975. “ Markovian Properties of Forest Succession.” In The Ecology and Evolution of Communities, edited by M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond, 196–211. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
- Horn, H.S., and R.H. MacArthur. 1972. “Competition among Fugitive Species in a Harlequin Environment.” Ecology 53: 749–52.
- Hubbell, S.P., R.B. Foster, S.T. O'Brien, K.E. Harms, R. Condit, B. Wechsler, S.J. Wright, and S.L. de Lao. 1999. “Light-Gap Disturbances, Recruitment Limitation, and Tree Diversity in a Neotropical Forest.” Science 283: 554–7.
- Huston, M., and T. Smith. 1987. “Plant Succession: Life History and Competition.” American Naturalist 130: 168–98.
- Huth, A., T. Ditzer, and H. Bossel. 1996. Simulation of the Growth of Tropical Rain Forests—FORMIX3. Final Report to German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), Reports of the Environmental Systems Research Center 9602, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany.
- Kinzig, A.P., S.A. Levin, J. Dushoff, and S. Pacala. 1999. “Limiting Similarity, Species Packing, and System Stability for Hierarchical Competition-Colonization Models.” American Naturalist 153: 371–83.
- Kitajima, K. 1994. “Relative Importance of Photosynthetic Traits and Allocation Patterns as Correlates of Seedling Shade Tolerance of 13 Tropical Trees.” Oecologia 98: 419–28.
- Kohyama, T. 1992. “Size-Structured Multi-Species Model of Rain Forest Trees.” Functional Ecology 6: 206.
- Kohyama, T. 1993. “Size-Structured Tree Populations in Gap-Dynamic Forest—The Forest Architecture Hypothesis for the Stable Coexistence of Species.” Journal of Ecology 81: 131.
- Koven, C.D., R.G. Knox, R.A. Fisher, J.Q. Chambers, B.O. Christoffersen, S.J. Davies, M. Detto, et al. 2020. “Benchmarking and Parameter Sensitivity of Physiological and Vegetation Dynamics Using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama”. Biogeosciences 17(11): 3017–44. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-3017-2020
- M. Leck, V. Parker, and R. Simpson, eds. 1989. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. London: Academic Press.
- Levins, R., and D. Culver. 1971. “Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 68: 1246–8.
- MacArthur, R. 1970. “Species Packing and Competitive Equilibrium for Many Species.” Theoretical Population Biology 1: 1–11.
- Macarthur, R., and R. Levins. 1967. “The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species.” American Naturalist 101: 377–85.
- Martínez Cano, I., E. Shevliakova, S. Malyshev, S.J. Wright, M. Detto, S.W. Pacala, and H.C. Muller-Landau. 2020. “Allometric Constraints and Competition Enable the Simulation of Size Structure and Carbon Fluxes in a Dynamic Vegetation Model of Tropical Forests (LM3PPA-TV).” Global Change Biology 26: 1–17.
- Moorcroft, P.R., G.C. Hurtt, and S.W. Pacala. 2001. “A Method for Scaling Vegetation Dynamics: The Ecosystem Demography Model (ED).” Ecological Monographs 71: 557–86.
- Muller-Landau, H.C. 2010. “The Tolerance-Fecundity Trade-off and the Maintenance of Diversity in Seed Size.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 4242–7.
- Nevai, A.L., and R.R. Vance. 2008. “The Role of Leaf Height in Plant Competition for Sunlight: Analysis of a Canopy Partitioning Model.” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 5: 101–24.
- Pacala, S.W., and M. Rees. 1998. “Models Suggesting Field Experiments to Test Two Hypotheses Explaining Successional Diversity.” American Naturalist 152: 729–37.
- Pacala, W., C.D. Canham, and J. Silander. 1993. “Forest Models Defined by field measurements: i. The design of a Northeastern Forest Simulator.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23: 1980–8.
- Parvinen, K., and G. Meszéna. 2009. “Disturbance-Generated Niche-Segregation in a Structured Metapopulation Model.” Evolutionary Ecology Research 11: 651–66.
- Purves, D.W., J.W. Lichstein, N. Strigul, and S.W. Pacala. 2008. “Predicting and Understanding Forest Dynamics using a Simple Tractable Model.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 17018–22.
- Ricard, J.-P., C. Messier, S. Delagrange, and M. Deaudey. 2003. “Do Understory Sapling Respond to Both Light and Below-Ground Competition? A Field Experiment in a North-Eastern American Hardwood Forest and a Literature Review Jean-Pierre.” Annals of Forest Science 60: 749–56.
- Rüger, N., L.S. Comita, R. Condit, D. Purves, B. Rosenbaum, M.D. Visser, S.J. Wright, and C. Wirth. 2018. “Beyond the Fast–Slow Continuum: Demographic Dimensions Structuring a Tropical Tree Community.” Ecology Letters 21: 1075–84.
- Rüger, N., R. Condit, D.H. Dent, S.J. DeWalt, S.P. Hubbell, J.W. Lichstein, O.R. Lopez, C. Wirth, and C.E. Farrior. 2020. “Demographic Tradeoffs Predict Tropical Forest Dynamics.” Science 368: 165–8.
- Russo, S.E., S.M. Mcmahon, M. Detto, G. Ledder, S.J. Wright, R.S. Condit, and S.J. Davies. 2020. “The Interspecific Growth–Mortality Trade-Off Is Not a General Framework for Tropical Forest Community Structure.” Nature Ecology and Evolution 5: 174–83.
- Salguero-Gómez, R., O.R. Jones, E. Jongejans, S.P. Blomberg, D.J. Hodgson, C. Mbeau-Ache, P.A. Zuidema, H. de Kroon, and Y.M. Buckley. 2016. “Fast-Slow Continuum and Reproductive Strategies Structure Plant Life-History Variation Worldwide.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 113: 230–5.
- Samson, D.A., and K.S. Werk. 1986. “Size-Dependent Effects in the Analysis of Reproductive Effort in Plants.” American Naturalist 127: 667–80.
- Shugart, H.H., T.M. Smith, and W.M. Post. 1992. “The Potential for Application of Individual-Based Simulation Models for Assessing the Effects of Global Change.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23: 15–38.
- Strigul, N., D. Pristinski, D. Purves, J. Dushoff, and S. Pacala. 2008. “Scaling from Trees to Forests: Tractable Macroscopic Equations for Forest Dynamics.” Ecological Monographs 78: 523–45.
- Tilman, D. 1985. “The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession.” American Naturalist 125: 827–52.
- Tilman, D. 1994. “Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats.” Ecology 75: 2–16.
- Uyehara, I.K. 2019. On Growth and Form: Mathematical Models of Plant Strategies (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
- Violle, C., B.J. Enquist, B.J. McGill, L. Jiang, C.H. Albert, C. Hulshof, V. Jung, and J. Messier. 2012. “The Return of the Variance: Intraspecific Variability in Community Ecology.” Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27: 244–52.
- Visser, M.D., M. Bruijning, S.J. Wright, H.C. Muller-Landau, E. Jongejans, L.S. Comita, and H. Kroon. 2016. “Functional Traits as Predictors of Vital Rates across the Life Cycle of Tropical Trees.” Functional Ecology 30: 168–80.
- Weiner, J. 2012. “Mechanisms of the Degree of Size Asymmetry Determining in Competition among Plants.” Oecologia 113: 447–55.
- Wright, S.J., M.A. Jaramillo, J. Pavon, R. Condit, S.P. Hubbell, and R.B. Foster. 2005. “Reproductive Size Thresholds in Tropical Trees: Variation among Individuals, Species And Forests.” Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 307–15.
- Wright, S.J., K. Kitajima, N.J.B. Kraft, P.B. Reich, I.J. Wright, D.E. Bunker, R. Condit, et al. 2010. “Functional Traits and the Growth-Mortality Trade-Off in Tropical Trees.” Ecology 91: 3664–74.