Journal list menu

Volume 98, Issue 4 p. 909-919
Concepts and Synthesis

Community assembly and the functioning of ecosystems: how metacommunity processes alter ecosystems attributes

Mathew A. Leibold

Corresponding Author

Mathew A. Leibold

Department of Integrative Biology, 2415 Speedway #C0930, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712 USA

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan M. Chase

Jonathan M. Chase

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Deutscher Platz, 5e 04103 Leipzig, Germany

Department of Computer Science, Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
S. K. Morgan Ernest

S. K. Morgan Ernest

Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall PO Box 110430, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 84322 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 December 2016
Citations: 105
Corresponding Editor: Daniel Stephen Gruner.

Abstract

Recent work linking community structure and ecosystem function has primarily focused on the effects of local species richness but has neglected the dispersal-dependent processes of community assembly that are ultimately involved in determining community structure and its relation to ecosystems. Here we combine simple consumer-resource competition models and metacommunity theory with discussion of case studies to outline how spatial processes within metacommunities can alter community assembly and modify expectations about how species diversity and composition influence ecosystem attributes at local scales. We argue that when community assembly is strongly limited by dispersal, this can constrain ecosystem functioning by reducing positive selection effects (reducing the probability of the most productive species becoming dominant) even though it may often also enhance complementarity (favoring combinations of species that enhance production even though they may not individually be most productive). Conversely, excess dispersal with strong source-sink relations among heterogeneous habitats can reduce ecosystem functioning by swamping local filters that would normally favor better-suited species. Ecosystem function is thus most likely maximized at intermediate levels of dispersal where both of these effects are minimized. In this scenario, we find that the selection effect is maximized, while complementarity is often reduced and local diversity may often be relatively low. Our synthesis emphasizes that it is the entire set of community assembly processes that affect the functioning of ecosystems, not just the part that determines local species richness.