Journal list menu
Beta diversity as a driver of forest biomass across spatial scales
Corresponding Author
Jacqueline C. Reu
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Correspondence
Jacqueline C. Reu
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher P. Catano
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarko J. Spasojevic
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan A. Myers
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jacqueline C. Reu
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Correspondence
Jacqueline C. Reu
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher P. Catano
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMarko J. Spasojevic
Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan A. Myers
Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJ.C. Reu and C.P. Catano contributed equally to this manuscript.
Funding information: NSF-DEB, Grant/Award Number: 1557094
Abstract
Despite the importance of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships in ecology and conservation, relatively little is known about how BEF relationships change across spatial scales. Theory predicts that change in BEF relationships with increasing spatial scale will depend on variation in species composition across space (β-diversity), but empirical evidence for this is limited. Moreover, studies have not quantified the direct and indirect role the environment plays in costructuring ecosystem functioning across spatial scales. We used 14 temperate-forest plots 1.4 ha in size containing 18,323 trees to quantify scale-dependence between aboveground tree biomass and three components of tree-species diversity—α-diversity (average local diversity), γ-diversity (total diversity), and β-diversity. Using structural-equation models, we quantified the direct effects of each diversity component and the environment (soil nutrients and topography), as well as indirect effects of the environment, on tree biomass across 11 spatial extents ranging from 400 to 14,400 m2. Our results show that the relationship between β-diversity and tree biomass strengthened with increasing spatial extent. Moreover, β-diversity appeared to be a stronger predictor of biomass than α-diversity and γ-diversity at intermediate to large spatial extents. The environment had strong direct and indirect effects on biomass, but, in contrast to diversity, these effects did not strengthen with increasing spatial extent. This study provides some of the first empirical evidence that β-diversity underpins the scaling of BEF relationships in naturally complex ecosystems.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data and code (chcatano, 2022) are available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6506797.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ecy3774-sup-0001-Appendix_S1.pdfPDF document, 2 MB | Appendix S1 |
ecy3774-sup-0002-Appendix_S2.pdfPDF document, 632.7 KB | Appendix S2 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Anderson, M. J., T. O. Crist, A. L. Freestone, and N. J. Sanders. 2011. “Navigating the Multiple Meanings of β Diversity: A Roadmap for the Practicing Ecologist.” Ecology Letters 14: 19–28.
- Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., S. J. Davies, A. C. Bennett, E. B. Gonzalez-Akre, H. C. Muller-Landau, S. Joseph Wright, K. Abu Salim, et al. 2014. “CTFS-ForestGEO: A Worldwide Network Monitoring Forests in an Era of Global Change.” Global Change Biology 21(2): 528–49.
- Balvanera, P., A. B. Pfisterer, N. Buchmann, J.-S. He, T. Nakashizuka, D. Raffaelli, and B. Schmid. 2006. “Quantifying the Evidence for Biodiversity Effects on Ecosystem Functioning and Services.” Ecology Letters 9: 1146–56.
- Barnes, A. D., P. Weigelt, M. Jochum, D. Ott, D. Hodapp, N. F. Haneda, and U. Brose. 2016. “Species Richness and Biomass Explain Spatial Turnover in Ecosystem Functioning across Tropical and Temperate Ecosystems.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371: 20150279.
- Barry, K. E., G. A. Pinter, J. W. Strini, K. Yang, I. G. Lauko, S. A. Schnitzer, A. T. Clark, et al. 2021. “A Graphical Null Model for Scaling Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning Relationships.” Journal of Ecology 109: 1549–60.
- Cardinale, B. J., K. L. Matulich, D. U. Hooper, J. E. Byrnes, E. Duffy, L. Gamfeldt, P. Balvanera, M. I. O. Connor, and A. Gonzalez. 2011. “The Functional Role of Producer Diversity in Ecosystems.” American Journal of Botany 98: 572–92.
- Catano, C. P., T. L. Dickson, and J. A. Myers. 2017. “Dispersal and Neutral Sampling Mediate Contingent Effects of Disturbance on Plant Beta-Diversity: A Meta-Analysis.” Ecology Letters 20: 347–56.
- Catano, C. P., T. S. Fristoe, J. A. Lamanna, and J. A. Myers. 2020. “Local Species Diversity, β-Diversity and Climate Influence the Regional Stability of Bird Biomass across North America.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287: 20192520.
- Catano, C. P., E. Grman, E. Behrens, and L. A. Brudvig. 2021. “Species Pool Size Alters Species–Area Relationships during Experimental Community Assembly.” Ecology 102: 1–7.
- Chase, J. M., B. J. McGill, D. J. McGlinn, F. May, S. A. Blowes, X. Xiao, T. M. Knight, O. Purschke, and N. J. Gotelli. 2018. “Embracing Scale-Dependence to Achieve a Deeper Understanding of Biodiversity and its Change across Communities.” Ecology Letters 21: 1737–51.
- chcatano. 2022. “ chcatano/SPFD_tree_diversity-biomass: data and analysis scripts: Reu et al. beta diversity as a driver of forest biomass across scales.” Ecology (v1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6506797.
10.5281/zenodo.6506797 Google Scholar
- Chisholm, R. A., H. C. Muller-Landau, K. Abdul Rahman, D. P. Bebber, Y. Bin, S. A. Bohlman, N. A. Bourg, et al. 2013. “Scale-Dependent Relationships between Tree Species Richness and Ecosystem Function in Forests.” Journal of Ecology 101: 1214–24.
- Dornelas, M., N. J. Gotelli, B. McGill, H. Shimadzu, F. Moyes, C. Sievers, and A. E. Magurran. 2014. “Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss.” Science 344: 296–9.
- Gonzalez, A., R. M. Germain, D. S. Srivastava, E. Filotas, L. E. Dee, D. Gravel, P. L. Thompson, et al. 2020. “Scaling-up Biodiversity-Ecosystem Functioning Research.” Ecology Letters 23: 757–76.
- Haddad, N. M., A. Gonzalez, L. A. Brudvig, M. A. Burt, D. J. Levey, and E. I. Damschen. 2017. “Experimental Evidence Does Not Support the Habitat Amount Hypothesis.” Ecography 40: 48–55.
- Hammill, E., C. P. Hawkins, H. S. Greig, P. Kratina, J. B. Shurin, and T. B. Atwood. 2018. “Landscape Heterogeneity Strengthens the Relationship between β-Diversity and Ecosystem Function.” Ecology 99: 2467–75.
- Hautier, Y., F. Isbell, E. T. Borer, E. W. Seabloom, W. S. Harpole, E. M. Lind, A. S. MacDougall, et al. 2017. “Local Loss and Spatial Homogenization of Plant Diversity Reduce Ecosystem Multifunctionality.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 2: 50–6.
- Hooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, J. H. Lawton, et al. 2005. “Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning: A Consensus of Current Knowledge.” Ecological Monograms 75: 3–35.
- Isbell, F., J. Cowles, L. E. Dee, M. Loreau, P. B. Reich, A. Gonzalez, A. Hector, and B. Schmid. 2018. “Quantifying Effects of Biodiversity on Ecosystem Functioning across Times and Places.” Ecology Letters 21: 763–78.
- Isbell, F., A. Gonzalez, M. Loreau, J. Cowles, S. Díaz, A. Hector, G. M. Mace, et al. 2017. “Linking the Influence and Dependence of People on Biodiversity across Scales.” Nature 546: 65–72.
- Jenkins, J. C., D. C. Chojnacky, L. S. Heath, and R. A. Birdsey. 2004. Comprehensive Database of Diameter-Based Biomass Regressions for North American Tree Species. Newton Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
10.2737/NE-GTR-319 Google Scholar
- LaManna, J. A., S. A. Mangan, A. Alonso, N. A. Bourg, W. Y. Brockelman, S. Bunyavejchewin, L. Chang, et al. 2017. “Plant Diversity Increases with the Strength of Negative Density Dependence at the Global Scale.” Science 356: 1389–92.
- LaManna, J. A., M. L. Walton, B. L. Turner, and J. A. Myers. 2016. “Negative Density Dependence Is Stronger in Resource-Rich Environments and Diversifies Communities when Stronger for Common but Not Rare Species.” Ecology Letters 19: 657–67.
- Lefcheck, J. S. 2016. “piecewiseSEM: Piecewise Structural Equation Modeling in R for Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 7: 573–9.
- Leibold, M., A. M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, et al. 2004. “The Metacommunity Concept: A Framework for Multi-Scale Community Ecology.” Ecology Letters 7: 601–13.
- Leibold, M. A., J. M. Chase, and S. K. M. Ernest. 2017. “Community Assembly and the Functioning of Ecosystems: How Metacommunity Processes Alter Ecosystems Attributes.” Ecology 98: 909–19.
- Liang, J., J. Buongiorno, and R. A. Monserud. 2005. “Growth and Yield of all-Aged Douglas-Fir – Western Hemlock Forest Stands: A Matrix Model with Stand Diversity and Diversity Effects.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 2368–81.
- Liang, J., T. W. Crowther, N. Picard, S. Wiser, M. Zhou, G. Alberti, E. D. Schulze, et al. 2016. “Positive Biodiversity-Productivity Relationship Predominant in Global Forests.” Science 354: 196.
- Liang, J., M. Zhou, P. C. Tobin, A. D. McGuire, and P. B. Reich. 2015. “Biodiversity Influences Plant Productivity through Niche-Efficiency.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112: 5738–43.
- Luo, W., J. Liang, R. Cazzolla Gatti, X. Zhao, and C. Zhang. 2019. “Parameterization of Biodiversity–Productivity Relationship and its Scale Dependency Using Georeferenced Tree-Level Data.” Journal of Ecology 107: 1106–19.
- Lutz, J. A., T. J. Furniss, D. J. Johnson, S. J. Davies, D. Allen, A. Alonso, K. J. Anderson-Teixeira, et al. 2018. “Global Importance of Large-Diameter Trees.” Global Ecology and Biogeography 27: 849–64.
- McGill, B. J., M. Dornelas, N. J. Gotelli, and A. E. Magurran. 2015. “Fifteen Forms of Biodiversity Trend in the Anthropocene.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 104–13.
- McKinney, M. L., and J. L. Lockwood. 1999. “Biotic Homogenization: A Few Winners Replacing Many Losers in the Next Mass Extinction.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14: 450–3.
- Myers, J. A., J. M. Chase, I. Jiménez, P. M. Jørgensen, A. Araujo-Murakami, N. Paniagua-Zambrana, and R. Seidel. 2013. “Beta-Diversity in Temperate and Tropical Forests Reflects Dissimilar Mechanisms of Community Assembly.” Ecology Letters 16: 151–7.
- Pasari, J., T. Levi, E. Zavaleta, and D. Tilman. 2013. “Several Scales of Biodiversity Affect Ecosystem Multifunctionality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 10219–22.
- van der Plas, F., P. Manning, S. Soliveres, E. Allan, M. Scherer-lorenzen, K. Verheyen, C. Wirth, et al. 2016. “Biotic Homogenization Can Decrease Landscape-Scale Forest Multifunctionality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 3557–62.
- Reynolds, H. L., G. G. Mittelbach, T. L. Darcy-Hall, G. R. Houseman, and K. L. Gross. 2007. “No Effect of Varying Soil Resource Heterogeneity on Plant Species Richness in a Low Fertility Grassland.” Journal of Ecology 95: 723–33.
- Spasojevic, M. J., B. L. Turner, and J. A. Myers. 2016. “When Does Intraspecific Trait Variation Contribute to Functional Beta-Diversity?” Journal of Ecology 104: 487–96.
- Spasojevic, M. J., E. A. Yablon, B. Oberle, and J. A. Myers. 2014. “Ontogenetic Trait Variation Influences Tree Community Assembly across Environmental Gradients.” Ecosphere 5: 129.
- Srivastava, D. S., and M. Vellend. 2005. “Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Research: Is it Relevant to Conservation?” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 267–94.
- Stephenson, N. L., A. J. Das, R. Condit, S. E. Russo, P. J. Baker, N. G. Beckman, D. A. Coomes, et al. 2014. “Rate of Tree Carbon Accumulation Increases Continuously with Tree Size.” Nature 507: 90–3.
- Thompson, P. L., F. Isbell, M. Loreau, M. I. O'connor, and A. Gonzalez. 2018. “The Strength of the Biodiversity-Ecosystem Function Relationship Depends on Spatial Scale.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 285: 20180038.
- Thompson, P. L., S. Kéfi, Y. R. Zelnik, L. E. Dee, S. Wang, C. de Mazancourt, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2021. “Scaling up Biodiversity Ecosystem Functioning Relationships: The Role of Environmental Variability in Space and Time.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 288: 20202779.
- Tilman, D., F. Isbell, and J. M. Cowles. 2014. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 45: 471–93.
- Winfree, R., J. R. Reilly, I. Bartomeus, D. P. Cariveau, N. M. Williams, and J. Gibbs. 2018. “Species Turnover Promotes the Importance of Bee Diversity for Crop Pollination at Regional Scales.” Science 359: 791–3.