Journal list menu
The role of species charisma in biological invasions
Corresponding Author
Ivan Jarić
Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorFranck Courchamp
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Orsay, France
Search for more papers by this authorRicardo A Correia
Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorSarah L Crowley
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
Search for more papers by this authorFranz Essl
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorAnke Fischer
Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorPablo González-Moreno
CABI, Egham, UK
RNM360, Departamento de Ingeniería Forestal, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorGregor Kalinkat
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorXavier Lambin
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Search for more papers by this authorBernd Lenzner
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorYves Meinard
Université Paris Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, Paris, France
Search for more papers by this authorAileen Mill
Modelling, Evidence and Policy Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCamille Musseau
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAna Novoa
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorJan Pergl
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorPetr Pyšek
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorKlára Pyšková
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Robertson
Modelling, Evidence and Policy Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMenja von Schmalensee
West Iceland Nature Research Centre, Stykkishólmur, Iceland
Search for more papers by this authorRoss T Shackleton
Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorRobert A Stefansson
West Iceland Nature Research Centre, Stykkishólmur, Iceland
Search for more papers by this authorKateřina Štajerová
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorDiogo Veríssimo
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, San Diego, CA
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan M Jeschke
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ivan Jarić
Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrobiology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorFranck Courchamp
Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Orsay, France
Search for more papers by this authorRicardo A Correia
Helsinki Lab of Interdisciplinary Conservation Science, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorSarah L Crowley
Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK
Search for more papers by this authorFranz Essl
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorAnke Fischer
Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorPablo González-Moreno
CABI, Egham, UK
RNM360, Departamento de Ingeniería Forestal, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorGregor Kalinkat
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorXavier Lambin
School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Search for more papers by this authorBernd Lenzner
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Search for more papers by this authorYves Meinard
Université Paris Dauphine, PSL Research University, CNRS, Paris, France
Search for more papers by this authorAileen Mill
Modelling, Evidence and Policy Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCamille Musseau
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAna Novoa
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorJan Pergl
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorPetr Pyšek
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorKlára Pyšková
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Robertson
Modelling, Evidence and Policy Group, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
Search for more papers by this authorMenja von Schmalensee
West Iceland Nature Research Centre, Stykkishólmur, Iceland
Search for more papers by this authorRoss T Shackleton
Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorRobert A Stefansson
West Iceland Nature Research Centre, Stykkishólmur, Iceland
Search for more papers by this authorKateřina Štajerová
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, Průhonice, Czech Republic
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
Search for more papers by this authorDiogo Veríssimo
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, San Diego, CA
Search for more papers by this authorJonathan M Jeschke
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Institute of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Commonly used in the literature to refer to the “attractiveness”, “appeal”, or “beauty” of a species, charisma can be defined as a set of characteristics – and the perception thereof – that affect people's attitudes and behaviors toward a species. It is a highly relevant concept for invasion science, with implications across all stages of the invasion process. However, the concept of invasive alien species (IAS) charisma has not yet been systematically investigated. We discuss this concept in detail, provide a set of recommendations for further research, and highlight management implications. We review how charisma affects the processes associated with biological invasions and IAS management, including species introductions and spread, media portrayals, public perceptions of species management, research attention, and active public involvement in research and management. Explicit consideration of IAS charisma is critical for understanding the factors that shape people's attitudes toward particular species, planning management measures and strategies, and implementing a combination of education programs, awareness raising, and public involvement campaigns.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
fee2195-sup-0001-FigS1.pdfPDF document, 598.6 KB | WebFigure 1 |
fee2195-sup-0002-TableS1.pdfPDF document, 371.4 KB | WebTable 1 |
fee2195-sup-0003-TableS2.pdfPDF document, 97.5 KB | WebTable 2 |
fee2195-sup-0004-TableS3.pdfPDF document, 123.7 KB | WebTable 3 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Albert C, Luque GM, and Courchamp F. 2018. The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS ONE 13: e0199149.
- Allen BL. 2018. And the people's choice award goes to…dogs: a comment on Home et al. Anim Conserv 21: 283–84.
- Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Essl F, et al. 2018. Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT). Methods Ecol Evol 9: 159–68.
- Backstrom AC, Garrard GE, Hobbs RJ, et al. 2018. Grappling with the social dimensions of novel ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 16: 109–17.
- Beever EA, Simberloff D, Crowley SL, et al. 2019. Social–ecological mismatches create conservation challenges in introduced species management. Front Ecol Environ 17: 117–25.
- Benediktsson K. 2015. Floral hazards: Nootka lupin in Iceland and the complex politics of invasive life. Geogr Ann B 97: 139–54.
- Bertolino S and Genovesi P. 2003. Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia. Biol Conserv 109: 351–58.
- Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, et al. 2011. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26: 333–39.
- Byerly H, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, et al. 2018. Nudging pro-environmental behavior: evidence and opportunities. Front Ecol Environ 16: 159–68.
- Chucholl C and Wendler F. 2017. Positive selection of beautiful invaders: long-term persistence and bio-invasion risk of freshwater crayfish in the pet trade. Biol Invasions 19: 197–208.
- Clark JA and May RM. 2002. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297: 191–92.
- Clavero M. 2014. Shifting baselines and the conservation of non-native species. Conserv Biol 28: 1434–36.
- Courchamp F, Jarić I, Albert C, et al. 2018. The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals. PLoS Biol 16: e2003997.
- Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, and McDonald RA. 2017. Conflict in invasive species management. Front Ecol Environ 15: 133–41.
- Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, and McDonald RA. 2018. Killing squirrels: exploring motivations and practices of lethal wildlife management. Environ Planning E: Nat Space 1: 120–43.
10.1177/2514848617747831 Google Scholar
- Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, and McDonald RA. 2019. The parakeet protectors: understanding opposition to introduced species management. J Environ Manage 229: 120–32.
- Dembitzer J. 2017. The case for hippos in Colombia. Isr J Ecol Evol 63: 5–8.
- Dickie IA, Bennett BM, Burrows LE, et al. 2014. Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol Invasions 16: 705–19.
- Donaldson MR, Burnett NJ, Braun DC, et al. 2016. Taxonomic bias and international biodiversity conservation research. Facets 1: 105–13.
- Ellis MM and Elphick CS. 2007. Using a stochastic model to examine the ecological, economic and ethical consequences of population control in a charismatic invasive species: mute swans in North America. J Appl Ecol 44: 312–22.
- Estévez RA, Anderson CB, Pizarro JC, et al. 2015. Clarifying values, risk perceptions, and attitudes to resolve or avoid social conflicts in invasive species management. Conserv Biol 29: 19–30.
- Fischer A, Selge S, van der Wal R, and Larson BMH. 2014. The public and professionals reason similarly about the management of non-native invasive species: a quantitative investigation of the relationship between beliefs and attitudes. PLoS ONE 9: e105495.
- Fleming PA and Bateman PW. 2016. The good, the bad, and the ugly: which Australian terrestrial mammal species attract most research? Mammal Rev 46: 241–54.
- García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, González JA, et al. 2008. Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: implications for management. Biol Conserv 141: 2969–83.
- Genovesi P and Bertolino S. 2001. Human dimension aspects in invasive alien species issues: the case of the failure of the grey squirrel eradication project in Italy. In: JA McNeely (Ed). The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
- Gobster PH. 2011. Factors affecting people's responses to invasive species management. In: ID Rotherham and RA Lambert (Eds). Invasive and introduced plants and animals: human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. London, UK: Earthscan.
- Green SJ, Underwood EB, and Akins JL. 2017. Mobilizing volunteers to sustain local suppression of a global marine invasion. Conserv Lett 10: 726–35.
- Ikeda T, Asano M, Yohei Matoba Y, et al. 2004. Present status of invasive alien raccoon and its impact in Japan. Global Environ Res 8: 125–31.
- Jarić I, Correia RA, Roberts DL, et al. 2019. On the overlap between scientific and societal taxonomic attentions – insights for conservation. Sci Total Environ 648: 772–78.
- Kueffer C and Kull CA. 2017. Non-native species and the aesthetics of nature. In: M Montserrat Vilà and PE Hulme (Eds). Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_20 Google Scholar
- Kutlvašr J, Pergl J, Baroš A, et al. 2019. Survival, dynamics of spread and invasive potential of species in perennial plantations. Biol Invasions 21: 561–73.
- Ladle RJ, Correia RA, Do Y, et al. 2016. Conservation culturomics. Front Ecol Environ 14: 270–76.
- Larson BM. 2005. The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Front Ecol Environ 3: 495–500.
- Liordos V, Kontsiotis VJ, Georgari M, et al. 2017. Public acceptance of management methods under different human–wildlife conflict scenarios. Sci Total Environ 579: 685–93.
- Lorimer J. 2007. Nonhuman charisma. Environ Plann D 25: 911–32.
- Lukas J, Kalinkat G, Kempkes M, et al. 2017. Feral guppies in Germany – a critical evaluation of a citizen science approach as biomonitoring tool. Bull Fish Biol 17: 13–27.
- Maceda-Veiga A, Domínguez-Domínguez O, Escribano-Alacid J, et al. 2016. The aquarium hobby: can sinners become saints in freshwater fish conservation? Fish Fish 17: 860–74.
- Mack RN. 2001. Motivations and consequences of the human dispersal of plants. In: JA McNeely (Ed). The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
- McNeely JA. 2001. An introduction to human dimensions of invasive alien species. In: JA McNeely (Ed). The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
- Melero Y. 2017. Communication of flagship species in conservation: lessons from invasive management projects. Biodivers Conserv 26: 2973–78.
- Novoa A, Shackleton R, Canavan S, et al. 2018. A framework for engaging stakeholders on the management of alien species. J Environ Manage 205: 286–97.
- Nuñez MA and Simberloff D. 2005. Invasive species and the cultural keystone species concept. Ecol Soc 10: 4.
- Nuñez MA, Kuebbing S, Dimarco RD, et al. 2012. Invasive species: to eat or not to eat, that is the question. Conserv Lett 5: 334–41.
- Padilla DK and Williams SL. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 2: 131–38.
- Pagès M, Fischer A, and van der Wal R. 2018. The dynamics of volunteer motivations for engaging in the management of invasive plants: insights from a mixed-methods study on Scottish seabird islands. J Environ Plann Man 61: 904–23.
- Petursdottir T, Aradottir AL, and Benediktsson K. 2013. An evaluation of the short-term progress of restoration combining ecological assessment and public perception. Restor Ecol 21: 75–85.
- Pyšek P and Richardson DM. 2008. Traits associated with invasiveness in alien plants: where do we stand? In: W Nentwig (Ed). Biological invasions. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
- Pyšek P, Richardson DM, Pergl J, et al. 2008. Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 237–44.
- Schüttler E, Rozzi R, and Jax K. 2011. Towards a societal discourse on invasive species management: a case study of public perceptions of mink and beavers in Cape Horn. J Nat Conserv 19: 175–84.
- Shackleton RT, Richardson DM, Shackleton CM, et al. 2019. Explaining people's perceptions of invasive alien species: a conceptual framework. J Environ Manage 229: 10–26.
- Soga M and Gaston KJ. 2018. Shifting baseline syndrome: causes, consequences, and implications. Front Ecol Environ 16: 222–30.
- van der Wal R, Fischer A, Selge S, et al. 2015. Neither the public nor experts judge species primarily on their origins. Environ Conserv 42: 349–55.
- van Kleunen M, Essl F, Pergl J, et al. 2018. The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions. Biol Rev 93: 1421–37.
- Veitch CR and Clout MN. 2001. Human dimensions in the management of invasive species in New Zealand. In: JA McNeely (Ed). The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive alien species. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
- Verbrugge LN, Van den Born RJ, and Lenders HR. 2013. Exploring public perception of non-native species from a visions of nature perspective. Environ Manage 52: 1562–73.
- Veríssimo D, MacMillan DC, and Smith RJ. 2011. Toward a systematic approach for identifying conservation flagships. Conserv Lett 4: 1–8.
- Veríssimo D, Vaughan G, Ridout M, et al. 2017. Increased conservation marketing effort has major fundraising benefits for even the least popular species. Biol Conserv 211: 95–101.
- Wallach AD, Bekoff M, Batavia C, et al. 2018. Summoning compassion to address the challenges of conservation. Conserv Biol 32: 1255–65.
- Wilson JR, Procheş Ş, Braschler B, et al. 2007. The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society. Front Ecol Environ 5: 409–14.