Journal list menu
Review
Forest carbon storage: ecology, management, and policy
Timothy J Fahey,
Peter B Woodbury,
John J Battles,
Christine L Goodale,
Steven P Hamburg, Scott V Ollinger, Christopher W Woodall,
Corresponding Author
Timothy J Fahey
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
* (E-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorPeter B Woodbury
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Search for more papers by this authorJohn J Battles
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Search for more papers by this authorChristine L Goodale
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher W Woodall
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St Paul, MN
Search for more papers by this authorTimothy J Fahey,
Peter B Woodbury,
John J Battles,
Christine L Goodale,
Steven P Hamburg, Scott V Ollinger, Christopher W Woodall,
Corresponding Author
Timothy J Fahey
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
* (E-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this authorPeter B Woodbury
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Search for more papers by this authorJohn J Battles
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Search for more papers by this authorChristine L Goodale
College of Agriculture and Life Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Search for more papers by this authorChristopher W Woodall
USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, St Paul, MN
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The objective of this review is to give ecologists and policy makers a better understanding of forest carbon dynamics and recent policy and management activities in this arena. The ecology of forest carbon is well understood, but measurement and projection of carbon sequestration at small scales can be costly. Some forest management activities qualify as offsets in various carbon markets. To promote wider use, a system is needed that will provide inexpensive and standardized approaches to forest carbon accounting that are not prone to dishonest handling. The prospects are fairly promising for development of such a system, but first, technical and organizational constraints must be overcome. In contrast, the benefits – in terms of greenhouse-gas reduction – of substituting wood for other building materials, and in displacing fossil fuel energy, could be realized immediately, if standards for calculations can be developed.
References
- Alerich CL, Klevgard L, Liff C, and Miles PD 2004. The forest inventory and analysis database: database and user's guide version 1.7. http://fia.fs.fed.us. Viewed 22 May 2009.
- Borjesson P and Gustavsson L 2000. Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energ Policy 28 : 575–88.
- Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, and Baumgardner GA 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia 111 : 1–11.
- Call J and Hayes J 2007. A description and comparison of selected forest carbon registries: a guide for states considering the development of a forest carbon registry. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
- Canadell J and Raupach MR 2008. Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320 : 1456–57.
- Dixon GE 2003. Essential FVS: a user's guide to the Forest Vegetation Simulator. Internal report. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Forest Management Service Center.
- Driscoll CT, Lawrence GB, Bulger AJ, et al. 2001. Acidic deposition in the northeastern United States: sources, inputs, ecosystem effects, and management strategies. BioScience 51 : 180–98.
- Eriksson E, Gillespie AR, Gustavsson L, et al. 2007. Integrated carbon analysis of forest management practices and wood substitution. Can J Forest Res 37 : 671–81.
- Fahey TJ, Battles JJ, and Wilson GF 1998. Responses of early successional northern hardwood forests to changes in nutrient availability. Ecol Monogr 68 : 183–212.
- Fahey TJ, Siccama TG, Driscoll CT, et al. 2005. The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 75 : 109–76.
- Fain JJ, Volk TA, and Fahey TJ 1994. Fifty years of change in an upland forest in south-central New York: general patterns. B Torrey Bot Club 121 : 130–39.
- Guo LB and Gifford RM 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Glob Change Biol 8 : 345–60.
-
Hamburg SP
2000.
Simple rule for measuring changes in ecosystem carbon in forestry offset projects.
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change
5 :
25–37.
10.1023/A:1009692114618 Google Scholar
- Hamilton JG, DeLucia EH, George K, et al. 2002. Forest carbon balance under elevated CO2. Oecologia 131 : 250–60.
- Harmon ME, Bible K, Ryan MG, et al. 2004. Production respiration and overall carbon balance in an old-growth Pseudotsuga–Tsuga forest ecosystem. Ecosystems 7 : 498–512.
- Hurtt GC, Dubayah R, Drake J, et al. 2004. Beyond potential vegetation: combining lidar data and a height-structured model for carbon studies. Ecol Appl 14 : 873–83.
- Hurtt GC, Pacala SW, Moorcroft PR, et al. 2002. Projecting the future of the US carbon sink. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99 : 1389–94.
- Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, and Birdsey RA 2003. National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. Forest Sci 49 : 12–35.
- Keeton WS, Kraft CE, and Warren DR 2007. Mature and old-growth riparian forests: structure, dynamics and effects on Adirondack stream habitats. Ecol Appl 17 : 852–68.
-
Kloeppel BD,
Harmon ME, and
Fahey TJ
2007.
Estimating above-ground net primary productivity in forest-dominated ecosystems.
In
TJ Fahey and
AK Knapp
(Eds).
Principles and standards for measuring primary production.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195168662.003.0005 Google Scholar
- Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, and Harding DJ 2002. LIDAR remote sensing for ecosystem studies. BioScience 52 : 19–30.
- Luyssaert S, Schulze ED, Börner A, et al. 2008. Old-growth forests and global carbon sinks. Nature 455 : 213–15.
- Markewitz D 2006. Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. Forest Ecol Manag 236 : 153–61.
- Miles L and Kapos V 2008. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320 : 1454–55.
- Miner R and Perez-Garcia J 2007. The greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the global forest products industry. Forest Prod J 57 : 80–90.
- Nabuurs GJ, Masera O, Andrasko K, et al. 2007. Chapter 9: Working Group III contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. In B Metz, OR Davidson, PR Bosch, et al. (Eds). Climate change 2007: mitigation in climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Paul KI, Polgase PJ, Nyakuengama JG, and Khanna PK 2002. Changes in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecol Manag 168 : 241–57.
- Pearson TRH, Brown SL, and Birdsey RA 2007. Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service.
- Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, and Manriquez C 2005. An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and wood products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood Fiber Sci 37 : 140–48.
- Post WM and Kwon KC 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Glob Change Biol 6 : 317–27.
- Proctor P, Heath LS, VanDeusen P, et al. 2005. COLE: a web-based tool for interfacing with forest inventory data. In RE McRoberts, GA Reams, PC VanDeusen, and WH McWilliams (Eds). Proceedings of FIA Symposium. St Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service.
-
Ramankutty N,
Gibbs HD,
Achard F,
et al.
2007.
Challenges to estimating carbon emissions from tropical deforestation.
Glob Change Biol
13 :
51–66.
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01272.x Google Scholar
- Reinhardt ED and Crookston NL 2007. The fire and fuels extension to the Forest Vegetation Simulator – 2007 addendum. Ogden, UT: USDA Rocky Mountain Research Station.
- Schlamadinger B, Apps M, Bohlin F, et al. 1997. Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems. Biomass Bioenerg 13 : 359–75.
- Siccama TG, Fahey TJ, Johnson CE, et al. 2007. Population and biomass dynamics of trees in a northern hardwood forest at Hubbard Brook. Can J Forest Res 37 : 737–49.
- Skog KE 2008. Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Prod J 58 : 56–72.
- Smith JE, Heath LS, Skog KE, and Birdsey RA 2006. Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvest carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service.
- Smith JE, Heath LS, and Nichol MC 2007. US forest carbon calculation tool: forestland carbon stocks and net annual stock change. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service.
- Smithwick EAH, Harmon ME, Remillard SM, et al. 2002. Potential upper bounds of carbon storages in forests of the Pacific Northwest. Ecol Appl 12 : 1303–17.
- White MK, Gower ST, and Ahle DE 2005. Life-cycle inventories of roundwood production in northern Wisconsin: inputs to an industrial forest carbon budget. Forest Ecol Manag 219 : 13–28.
- Winjum JK and Schroeder PE 1997. Forest plantations of the world: their extent, ecological attributes, and carbon storage. Agric Forest Meteor 84 : 153–67.
- Woodall CW, Heath LS, and Smith JE 2008. National inventories of dead and downed forest carbon stocks in the United States: opportunities and challenges. Forest Ecol Manag 256 : 221–28.
- Woodbury PB, Smith JE, and Heath LS 2007a. Carbon sequestration in the US forest sector from 1990 to 2010. Forest Ecol Manag 241 : 14–27.
- Woodbury PB, Heath LS, and Smith JE 2007b. Effects of land use change on soil carbon cycling in the conterminous United States from 1900 to 2050. Glob Biogeochem Cy 21: GB3006.
