Journal list menu
Comparison of plant preference hierarchies of male and female moths and the impact of larval rearing hosts
Corresponding Author
Gunda Thöming
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Present address: Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research–Bioforsk, Division of Plant Health and Plant Protection, Høgskoleveien 7, NO-1432 Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMattias C. Larsson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBill S. Hansson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Hans-Knöll-Strasse 8, DE-07745 Jena, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Anderson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gunda Thöming
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Present address: Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research–Bioforsk, Division of Plant Health and Plant Protection, Høgskoleveien 7, NO-1432 Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMattias C. Larsson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorBill S. Hansson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Hans-Knöll-Strasse 8, DE-07745 Jena, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Anderson
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Division of Chemical Ecology, Box 102, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Editor: J. A. Rosenheim.
Abstract
Selection of a suitable host plant is essential for the fitness of herbivorous insects. For polyphagous insects the underlying proximate mechanisms for host plant selection, including phenotypic plasticity, remain only partially understood. We established an experimental protocol evaluating preferences to five plant species in males and females of the polyphagous moth Spodoptera littoralis. Female preference hierarchies were assessed by oviposition decisions; those of males were assessed by the attraction to female sex pheromones in background odors of different plant species. The experiments revealed clear preference hierarchies in both males and females, which were partly overlapping in spite of the different behavioral contexts of the respective assays. Furthermore, we demonstrated strong effects of the larval rearing host on adult plant preference, where the larval host plant species was generally elevated to the most preferred plant in both sexes, without otherwise affecting the overall preference hierarchy. Our results suggest that both sexes are involved in host plant choice and that experience-based convergent intersexual plant preferences may confer selective advantages. The host plant choice is guided by a stable plant preference hierarchy, which can be modified by the larval rearing host, permitting fast adaptation to variation in local conditions and to novel environments. It may also provide a mechanism for reducing costs associated with polyphagy by functional plasticity in plant choice.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3306060 | Research data pertaining to this article is located at figshare.com: |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Literature Cited
- Agrawal, A. A. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294: 321–326.
- Amin, A. A.,and M. F. Gergis. 2006. Integrated management strategies for control of cotton key pests in middle Egypt. Agronomy Research 4: 121–128.
- Anderson, P.,and H. Alborn. 1999. Oviposition response of the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis, to herbivore-damage in cotton. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 92: 45–51.
- Anderson, P., B. S. Hansson, U. Nilsson, Q. Han, M. Sjöholm, N. Skals,and S. Anton. 2007. Increased behavioural and neuronal sensitivity to sex pheromone after brief odour experience in a moth. Chemical Senses 32: 483–491.
- Anderson, P., M. M. Sadek, M. Larsson, B. S. Hansson,and G. Thöming. In press. Larval host plant experience modulates both mate finding and oviposition choice in a moth. Animal Behaviour. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.002
- Auld, J. R., A. A. Agrawal,and R. A. Relyea. 2010. Re-evaluating the costs and limits of adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277: 503–511.
- Barron, A. B. 2001. The life and death of Hopkins' host-selection principle. Journal of Insect Behaviour 14: 725–737.
- Bernays, E. A. 2001. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Annual Review of Entomology 46: 703–727.
- Bernays, E.,and M. Graham. 1988. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69: 886–892.
- Blackiston, D. J., E. S. Casey,and M. R. Weiss. 2008. Retention of memory through metamorphosis: can a moth remember what it learned as a caterpillar? PLoS One 3: e1736.
- Bolnick, D. I.,and B. M. Fitzpatrick. 2007. Sympatric speciation: models and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 459–487.
- Brown, E. S.,and C. F. Dewhurst. 1975. The genus Spodoptera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Africa and the Near East. Bulletin of Entomological Research 65: 221–265.
- Caillaud, M. C.,and S. Via. 2000. Specialized feeding behavior influences both ecological specialization and assortative mating in sympatric host race of pea aphid. American Naturalist 156: 606–621.
- Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham,and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflicts. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18: 41–47.
- Corbet, S. A. 1985. Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecological Entomology 10: 143–153.
- Davis, J. M.,and J. A. Stamps. 2004. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 411–416.
- Deng, J.-Y., H.-Y. Wie, Y.-P. Huang,and J.-W. Du. 2004. Enhancement of attraction to sex pheromones of Spodoptera exigua by volatile compounds produced by host plants. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 2037–2045.
- Downey, M. H.,and C. C. Nice. 2011. Experimental evidence of host race formation in Mitoura butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oikos 120: 1165–1174.
- Duckworth, R. A. 2009. The role of behaviour in evolution: a search for mechanism. Evolutionary Ecology 23: 513–531.
- Dukas, R. 2008. Evolutionary biology of insect learning. Annual Reviews of Entomology 53: 145–160.
- Dunlap, A. S.,and D. W. Stephens. 2012. Tracking a changing environment: optimal sampling, adaptive memory and overnight effects. Behavioural Processes 89: 86–94.
- Funk, D. J., K. E. Filchak,and J. L. Feder. 2002. Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116: 251–267.
- Futuyma, D. J., M. C. Keese,and S. J. Scheffer. 1993. Genetic constraints and the phylogeny of insect–plant associations: responses of Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to host plants of its congeners. Evolution 47: 888–905.
- Gibbs, M.,and H. van Dyck. 2009. Reproductive plasticity, oviposition site selection, and maternal effects in fragmented landscapes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 1–11.
- Gripenberg, S., P. J. Mayhew, M. Parnell,and T. Roslin. 2010. A meta-analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecology Letters 13: 383–393.
- Hinks, C. F.,and J. R. Byers. 1976. Biosystematics of the genus Exoa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): V. Rearing procedures, and life cycles of 36 species. Canadian Entomologist 108: 1345–1357.
- Jaenike, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 21: 243–273.
-
Janisch, E.
1930.
Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Wirkung der Umweltfaktoren auf Insekten.
Zoomorphology (Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere)
17:
339–416.
10.1007/BF00406262 Google Scholar
- Janz, N.,and S. Nylin. 2008. The oscillation hypothesis of host-plant range and speciation. Pages 203–215 in K. J Tilmon editor. Specialization, speciation, and radiation. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
- Janz, N., L. Söderlind,and S. Nylin. 2009. No effect of larval experience on adult host preference in Polygonia c-album (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): on the persistence of Hopkins' host selection principle. Ecological Entomology 34: 50–57.
- Kruskal, J. B.,and M. Wish. 1978. Multidimensional scaling. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. 07-;011. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California, USA.
- Landolt, P. J.,and T. W. Phillips. 1997. Host plant influences on sex pheromone behavior of phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42: 371–391.
- Leimar, O., P. Hammerstain,and T. J. M. Van Dooren. 2006. A new perspective on developmental plasticity and the principles on adaptive morph determination. American Naturalist 167: 367–376.
- Linn, C., J. L. Feder, S. Noijima, H. R. Dambroski, S. H. Berlocher,and W. Roelofs. 2003. Fruit odor discrimination and sympatric host race formation in Rhagoletis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 11490–11493.
-
Manly, B. F. J.
2004.
Multivariate statistical methods—
a primer. Third edition.
Chapman and Hall/CRC,
Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
10.1201/b16974 Google Scholar
- Marin, E. C., R. J. Watts, N. K. Tanaka, K. Ito,and L. Q. Luo. 2005. Developmentally programmed remodeling of the Drosophila olfactory circuit. Development 132: 725–737.
- Masante-Roca, I., S. Anton, L. Delbac, M.-C. Dufour,and C. Gadenne. 2007. Attraction of the grapevine moth to host and non-host plant parts in the wind-tunnel: effects of plant phenology, sex, and mating status. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 122: 239–245.
- Matsubayashi, K. W., I. Ohshima,and P. Nosil. 2010. Ecological speciation in phytophagous insects. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 134: 1–27.
- Mayhew, P. J. 1997. Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79: 417–428.
- Mery, F.,and J. G. Bruns. 2010. Behavioural plasticity: an interaction between evolution and experience. Evolutionary Ecology 24: 571–583.
- Moreau, J., J. Rahme, B. Benrey,and D. Thiery. 2008. Larval host plant origin modifies the adult oviposition preference of the female European grapevine moth Lobesia botrana. Naturwissenschaften 95: 317–324.
- Mousseau, T. A.,and H. Dingle. 1991. Maternal effects in insect life histories. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 511–534.
- Nasr, El-Sayed A., M. R. Tucker,and D. G. Campion. 1984. Distribution of moths of the Egyptian cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the Nile delta interpreted from catches in a pheromone trap network in relation to meteorological factors. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74: 487–494.
- Nosil, P.,and A. O. Mooers. 2005. Testing hypotheses about ecological specialization using phylogenetic trees. Evolution 59: 2256–2263.
- Olsson, P.-O. C., O. Anderbrant,and C. Löfstedt. 2006. Experience influences oviposition behaviour in two pyralid moths, Ephestia cautella and Plodia interpunctella. Animal Behaviour 72: 545–551.
- Ray, S. 1999. Survival of olfactory memory through metamorphosis in the fly Musca domestica. Neuroscience 259: 37–40.
- Renwick, J. A. A.,and F. S. Chew. 1994. Oviposition behaviour in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 39: 377–400.
- Sadek, M. M., B. S. Hansson,and P. Anderson. 2010. Does risk of egg parasitism affect choice of oviposition sites by a moth? A field and laboratory study. Basic and Applied Ecology 11: 135–143.
-
Salama, H. S.,
N. Z. Dimetry,and
S. A. Salem.
1971.
On the host plant preference and biology of the cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis Bois.
Journal of Applied Entomology
67:
261–266.
10.1111/j.1439-0418.1971.tb02122.x Google Scholar
- Schoonhoven, L. M., J. J. A. van Loon,and M. Dicke. 2005. Insect–plant biology. Second edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
- Singer, M. S. 2008. Evolutionary ecology of polyphagy. Pages 29–42 in K. J Tilmon editor. Specialization, speciation, and radiation. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
- Sokal, R. R.,and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
- Thompson, J. N.,and O. Pellmyr. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 65–89.
- Trona, F., D. Casado, M. Coracini, M. Bengtsson, C. Ioriatti,and P. Witzgall. 2010. Flight tunnel response of codling moth Cydia pomonella to blends of codlemone, codlemone antagonists and pear ester. Physiological Entomology 35: 249–254.
- Tully, T., V. Cambiazo,and L. Kruse. 1994. Memory through metamorphosis in normal and mutant Drosophila. Journal of Neuroscience 14: 68–74.
- Turlure, C.,and H. van Dyck. 2009. On the consequences of aggressive male mate-locating behaviour and micro-climate for female host plant use in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 63: 1581–1591.
- Via, S. 1999. Reproductive isolation between sympatric races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53: 1446–1457.
- Wiklund, C.,and M. Friberg. 2009. The evolutionary ecology of generalization: among-year variation in host plant use and offspring survival in a butterfly. Ecology 90: 3406–3417.