Journal list menu
Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach
Corresponding Author
Belinda Reyers
Natural Resources and Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorReinette Biggs
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorGraeme S Cumming
Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorThomas Elmqvist
Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAdam P Hejnowicz
Ecosystems and Society Research Cluster, Environment Department, University of York, York, UK
Search for more papers by this authorStephen Polasky
Department of Applied Economics/Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Belinda Reyers
Natural Resources and Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
([email protected])Search for more papers by this authorReinette Biggs
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorGraeme S Cumming
Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorThomas Elmqvist
Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for more papers by this authorAdam P Hejnowicz
Ecosystems and Society Research Cluster, Environment Department, University of York, York, UK
Search for more papers by this authorStephen Polasky
Department of Applied Economics/Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Despite growing interest and investment in ecosystem services across global science and policy arenas, it remains unclear how ecosystem services – and particularly changes in those services – should be measured. The social and ecological factors, and their interactions, that create and alter ecosystem services are inherently complex. Measuring and managing ecosystem services requires a sophisticated systems-based approach that accounts for how these services are generated by interconnected social–ecological systems (SES), how different services interact with each other, and how changes in the total bundle of services influence human well-being (HWB). Furthermore, there is a need to understand how changes in HWB feedback and affect the generation of ecosystem services. Here, we outline an SES-based approach for measuring ecosystem services and explore its value for setting policy targets, developing indicators, and establishing monitoring and assessment programs.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
i1540-9295-11-5-268-s1.pdfPDF document, 20.9 KB | Supplementary Data |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Anderies JM, Janssen MA, and Ostrom E. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social–ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc 9: 18.
- Attaran A. 2005. An immeasurable crisis? A criticism of the Millennium Development Goals and why they cannot be measured. PLoS Med 2: e318; doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020318.
- Bennett EM, Peterson GD, and Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12: 1394–404.
- Berkes F, Colding J, and Folke C. 2003. Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Env Resour 37: 421–48.
- Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 1305–12.
- Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, and Folke C. 2009. Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. New York, NY: Springer.
- Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, et al. 2008. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 9483–88.
- Cundill G, Cumming GS, Biggs D, et al. 2012. Soft systems thinking and social learning for adaptive management. Conserv Biol 26: 13–20.
- Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, et al. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services: potential contributions to the ecosystems services science and policy agenda. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 8812–19.
- Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, et al. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv 38: 370–79.
- de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, et al. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 7: 260–72.
- Easdale MH and Aguiar MR. 2012. Regional forage production assessment in arid and semi-arid rangelands – a step towards social–ecological analysis. J Arid Environ 83: 35–44.
- Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B, et al. 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ 63: 714–21.
- Fisher B and Turner RK. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biol Conserv 141: 1167–69.
- Folke C and Rockström J. 2011. 3rd Nobel laureate symposium on global sustainability: transforming the world in an era of global change. Ambio 40: 717–18.
- Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, et al. 2005. Adaptive governance of social–ecological systems. Annu Rev Env Resour 30: 441–73.
-
Haines-Young R and
Potschin M.
2010.
The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being.
In:
DG Raffaelli and
CLJ Frid
(Eds).
Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511750458.007 Google Scholar
- Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH, et al. 2011. The theory and practice of ecosystem service valuation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Layke C, Mapendembe A, Brown C, et al. 2012. Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: an analysis and next steps. Ecol Indic 17: 77–87.
- Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, et al. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185: 54–78.
- MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, Island Press.
- Mace GM and Baillie JEM. 2007. The 2010 biodiversity indicators: challenges for science and policy. Conserv Biol 21: 1406–13.
- Mace GM, Norris K, and Fitter AH. 2011. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27: 19–26.
- McArthur JW, Sachs JD, and Schmidt-Traub G. 2005. Response to Amir Attaran. PLoS Med 2: e379; doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020379.
- Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, et al. 2012. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol Econ 77: 27–35.
- Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325: 419–22.
- Ostrom E, Janssen MA, and Anderies JM. 2007. Going beyond panaceas. P Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 15176–78.
- Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani FS, et al. 2010. Ecosystem services for 2020. Science 330: 323–24.
- Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani FS, et al. 2011. Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Front Ecol Environ 9: 512–20.
- Reyers B, Polasky S, Tallis H, et al. 2012. Finding common ground for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 62: 503–07.
- Rogers DS, Duraiappah AK, Antons DC, et al. 2012. A vision for human well-being: transition to social sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4: 61–73.
- Rounsevell MDA, Dawson TP, and Harrison PA. 2010. A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv 19: 2823–42.
- Scholes RJ, Mace GM, Turner W, et al. 2008. Toward a global biodiversity observing system. Science 321: 1044–45.
- Syrbe RU and Walz U. 2010. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting, and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 21: 80–88.
- TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. Ecological and economic foundations. London, UK, and Washington, DC: Earthscan.
- UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2011. Indicators for the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020: report of the ad hoc technical expert group meeting on indicators for the strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/ind/ahteg-sp-ind-01/official/ahteg-sp-ind-01-02-en.pdf. Viewed 22 Mar 2013.
- Walker BH and Salt D. 2006. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.
- Walpole M, Almond R, Besançon C, et al. 2009. Tracking progress towards the 2010 biodiversity target and beyond. Science 325: 1503–04.
- Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C, et al. 2011. Tipping towards sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio 7: 762–80.