Journal list menu

Volume 14, Issue 8 p. 441-448
Concepts and Questions

Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene

Elena M Bennett,

Corresponding Author

McGill School of Environment and Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Canada

these authors contributed equally to this workelena.bennett@mcgill.caSearch for more papers by this author
Martin Solan,

Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

these authors contributed equally to this workSearch for more papers by this author
Reinette Biggs,

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Timon McPhearson,

Environmental Studies, Urban Ecology Lab, The New School, New York, NY

Search for more papers by this author
Albert V Norström,

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Per Olsson,

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Pereira,

Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

School of Environmental and Geographical Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Garry D Peterson,

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Ciara Raudsepp-Hearne,

Quebec Centre for Biodiversity Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Frank Biermann,

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen R Carpenter,

Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Erle C Ellis,

Geography & Environmental Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD

Search for more papers by this author
Tanja Hichert,

Hichert and Associates, Scenario Practitioners, Somerset West, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Victor Galaz,

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Myanna Lahsen,

Earth System Science Center, Brazilian Institute for Space Research (INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Manjana Milkoreit,

Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ

Search for more papers by this author
Berta Martin López,

Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Faculty of Sustainability, Institute of Ethics and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research, Lüneburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Kimberly A Nicholas,

Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Rika Preiser,

Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Gaia Vince,

The Wandering Gaia, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Joost M Vervoort,

Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jianchu Xu,

World Agroforestry Centre, Yunnan, China

Center for Mountain Ecosystem Studies, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yunnan, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 October 2016
Citations: 158

Abstract

The scale, rate, and intensity of humans’ environmental impact has engendered broad discussion about how to find plausible pathways of development that hold the most promise for fostering a better future in the Anthropocene. However, the dominance of dystopian visions of irreversible environmental degradation and societal collapse, along with overly optimistic utopias and business-as-usual scenarios that lack insight and innovation, frustrate progress. Here, we present a novel approach to thinking about the future that builds on experiences drawn from a diversity of practices, worldviews, values, and regions that could accelerate the adoption of pathways to transformative change (change that goes beyond incremental improvements). Using an analysis of 100 initiatives, or “seeds of a good Anthropocene”, we find that emphasizing hopeful elements of existing practice offers the opportunity to: (1) understand the values and features that constitute a good Anthropocene, (2) determine the processes that lead to the emergence and growth of initiatives that fundamentally change human–environmental relationships, and (3) generate creative, bottom-up scenarios that feature well-articulated pathways toward a more positive future.