Regular Article
IMPROVING RISK ASSESSMENT FOR NONTARGET SAFETY OF TRANSGENIC CROPS
First published: 01 August 2002
Cited by: 42
Abstract
In many countries, government regulations require environmental risk assessment prior to commercial sale and widespread planting of transgenic crops. Here I evaluate the design and statistical rigor of experiments used by industry to assess the safety of transgenic plants for nontarget organisms, as required under U.S. regulations. This review reveals that a few simple improvements in experimental design could greatly increase the rigor and information content of studies required under current regulations. For example, although most experiments were conducted for 1–4 wk, some of the tested species can live a year or more and could experience much longer periods of exposure. Moreover, the number of replicates used in these studies was generally quite small (usually 2–6 replicates per treatment), resulting in experiments that had little chance of detecting real effects. Clearly, sample sizes should be bolstered, and nonsignificant results should be accompanied by an analysis of statistical power. In addition, information readily available over the Internet is insufficient for a quantitative assessment of a transgenic crop's safety. Improved access to information regarding the details of risk assessment studies could greatly increase the public's ability to evaluate industry's claims of safety.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited: 42
- Li Zhaolei, Bu Naishun, Chen Xueping, Cui Jun, Xiao Manqiu, Song Zhiping, Nie Ming and Fang Changming, Soil incubation studies with Cry1Ac protein indicate no adverse effect of Bt crops on soil microbial communities, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 152, (33), (2018).
- Rui Catarino, Graziano Ceddia, Francisco J. Areal and Julian Park, The impact of secondary pests on Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops, Plant Biotechnology Journal, 13, 5, (601-612), (2015).
- J. Comas, B. Lumbierres, C. Comas, X. Pons and R. Albajes, Optimising the capacity of field trials to detect the effect of genetically modified maize on non‐target organisms through longitudinal sampling, Annals of Applied Biology, 166, 2, (183-195), (2014).
- , Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified animals, EFSA Journal, 11, 5, (n/a-n/a), (2013).
- Daniel Gregorowius, Petra Lindemann-Matthies and Markus Huppenbauer, Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 3, (265), (2012).
- Michelle Marvier, Using meta-analysis to inform risk assessment and risk management, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 6, S1, (113), (2011).
- Jörg Romeis, Richard L. Hellmich, Marco P. Candolfi, Keri Carstens, Adinda De Schrijver, Angharad M. R. Gatehouse, Rod A. Herman, Joseph E. Huesing, Morven A. McLean, Alan Raybould, Anthony M. Shelton and Annabel Waggoner, Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants, Transgenic Research, 10.1007/s11248-010-9446-x, 20, 1, (1-22), (2010).
- Magnus Wang and Michael Riffel, Making the right conclusions based on wrong results and small sample sizes: Interpretation of statistical tests in ecotoxicology, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.10.019, 74, 4, (684-692), (2011).
- , Scientific Opinion on the assessment of potential impacts of genetically modified plants on non‐target organisms, EFSA Journal, 8, 11, (2010).
- , Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants, EFSA Journal, 8, 11, (2010).
- Anne Ingeborg Myhr, A Precautionary Approach to Genetically Modified Organisms: Challenges and Implications for Policy and Science, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, 6, (501), (2010).
- Joe N. Perry, Cajo J.F. ter Braak, Philip M. Dixon, Jian J. Duan, Rosie S. Hails, Alexandra Huesken, Marc Lavielle, Michelle Marvier, Michele Scardi, Kerstin Schmidt, Bela Tothmeresz, Frank Schaarschmidt and Hilko van der Voet, Commentary: Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms, Environmental Biosafety Research, 10.1051/ebr/2009009, 8, 2, (65-78), (2009).
- , Scientific report of EFSA prepared by the GMO Unit on Public Consultation on the Updated Guidance Document of the Scientific Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants and derived food and feed, EFSA Journal, 7, 5, (293r), (2009).
- Emily Waltz, Under wraps, Nature Biotechnology, 27, 10, (880), (2009).
- Ian J. Mauro and Stéphane M. McLachlan, Farmer Knowledge and Risk Analysis: Postrelease Evaluation of Herbicide‐Tolerant Canola in Western Canada, Risk Analysis, 28, 2, (463-476), (2008).
- B. I. P. Barratt, K. E. Crook, C. M. Ferguson, P. D. Johnstone and L. A. Malone, Developing a method for laboratory biosafety testing impacts of transgenic plants on non‐target insects, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 128, 3, (437-449), (2008).
- Carol Auer, Ecological Risk Assessment and Regulation for Genetically-Modified Ornamental Plants, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 27, 4, (255), (2008).
- J. R. Prasifka, R. L. Hellmich, G. P. Dively, L. S. Higgins, P. M. Dixon and J. J. Duan, Selection of Nontarget Arthropod Taxa for Field Research on Transgenic Insecticidal Crops: Using Empirical Data and Statistical Power, Environmental Entomology, 37, 1, (1), (2008).
- Isik Icoz and Guenther Stotzky, Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40, 3, (559), (2008).
- Jian J. Duan, Michelle Marvier, Joseph Huesing, Galen Dively, Zachary Y. Huang and Andy Hector, A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Crops on Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), PLoS ONE, 3, 1, (e1415), (2008).
- J.B. Torres and J.R. Ruberson, Abundance and diversity of ground‐dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non‐Bt cotton fields, Annals of Applied Biology, 150, 1, (27-39), (2006).
- M. Marvier, C. McCreedy, J. Regetz and P. Kareiva, A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Cotton and Maize on Nontarget Invertebrates, Science, 316, 5830, (1475), (2007).
- Alan Raybould, Ecological versus ecotoxicological methods for assessing the environmental risks of transgenic crops, Plant Science, 173, 6, (589), (2007).
- Deborah G. Mayo and Aris Spanos, Philosophical Scrutiny of Evidence of Risks: From Bioethics to Bioevidence, Philosophy of Science, 73, 5, (803), (2006).
- J. Eckert, I. Schuphan, L. A. Hothorn and A. Gathmann, Arthropods on Maize Ears for Detecting Impacts ofBtMaize on Nontarget Organisms, Environmental Entomology, 35, 2, (554), (2006).
- B.I.P. Barratt, A. Moeed and L.A. Malone, Biosafety assessment protocols for new organisms in New Zealand: Can they apply internationally to emerging technologies?, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.008, 26, 4, (339-358), (2006).
- E. Ann Clark, Environmental risks of genetic engineering, Euphytica, 148, 1-2, (47), (2006).
- Jorge B. Torres and John R. Ruberson, Interactions of Bt-cotton and the omnivorous big-eyed bug Geocoris punctipes (Say), a key predator in cotton fields, Biological Control, 39, 1, (47), (2006).
- C. Ludy and A. Lang, A 3-year field-scale monitoring of foliage-dwelling spiders (Araneae) in transgenic Bt maize fields and adjacent field margins, Biological Control, 38, 3, (314), (2006).
- Joe N. Perry, Genetically Modified Organisms, Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, (2013).
- JIAN J. DUAN, CHANGJIAN JIANG, GRAHAM P. HEAD, MUHAMMAD A. BHATTI, DENNIS P. WARD, STEVE L. LEVINE, THOMAS E. NICKSON and MARGARET A. NEMETH, Statistical power analysis of a 2‐year field study and design of experiments to evaluate non‐target effects of genetically modified Bacillius thuringiensis corn, Ecological Entomology, 31, 5, (521-531), (2006).
- ACHIM GATHMANN, LUDGER WIROOKS, LUDWIG A. HOTHORN, DETLEF BARTSCH and INGOLF SCHUPHAN, Impact of Bt maize pollen (MON810) on lepidopteran larvae living on accompanying weeds, Molecular Ecology, 15, 9, (2677-2685), (2006).
- G.L. Lövei and S. Arpaia, The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 114, 1, (1-14), (2005).
- Steven E. Naranjo, Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies , Environmental Entomology, 10.1093/ee/34.5.1193, 34, 5, (1193-1210), (2005).
- Miriam D. Lopez, Jarrad R. Prasifka, Denny J. Bruck and Leslie C. Lewis, Utility of Ground Beetle Species in Field Tests of Potential Nontarget Effects of Bt Crops, Environmental Entomology, 34, 5, (1317), (2005).
- Olivier Sanvido, Franco Widmer, Michael Winzeler and Franz Bigler, A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants, Environmental Biosafety Research, 4, 1, (13), (2005).
- Jorge B. Torres and John R. Ruberson, Canopy- and Ground-Dwelling Predatory Arthropods in Commercial Bt and non- Bt Cotton Fields: Patterns and Mechanisms , Environmental Entomology, 10.1093/ee/34.5.1242, 34, 5, (1242-1256), (2005).
- Vassili V. Velkov, Alexander B. Medvinsky, Mikhail S. Sokolov and Anatoly I. Marchenko, Will transgenic plants adversely affect the environment?, Journal of Biosciences, 10.1007/BF02703726, 30, 4, (515-548), (2005).
- A. A. Snow, D. A. Andow, P. Gepts, E. M. Hallerman, A. Power, J. M. Tiedje and L. L. Wolfenbarger, GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ORGANISMS AND THE ENVIRONMENT: CURRENT STATUS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Ecological Applications, 15, 2, (377-404), (2005).
- Jörg Romeis, Anna Dutton and Franz Bigler, Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) has no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Journal of Insect Physiology, 50, 2-3, (175), (2004).
- , GE crops: balancing predictions of promise and peril, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2, 3, (154-160), (2004).
- D. A. Andow, Editorial: Negative and positive data, statistical power, and confidence intervals, Environmental Biosafety Research, 2, 2, (75), (2003).
