Confirmatory path analysis in a generalized multilevel context
Corresponding Editor: A. Ellison.
Abstract
This paper describes how to test, and potentially falsify, a multivariate causal hypothesis involving only observed variables (i.e., a path analysis) when the data have a hierarchical or multilevel structure, when different variables are potentially defined at different levels of such a hierarchy, and when different variables have different sampling distributions. The test is a generalization of Shipley's d‐sep test and can be conducted using standard statistical programs capable of fitting generalized mixed models.
Introduction
Hypothetical explanations of many ecological phenomena are both inherently multivariate and also implicitly or explicitly causal in nature. Even when such explanations cannot be fully tested using randomized manipulative experiments, many of the causal implications of such explanations can still be tested using confirmatory structural equations modeling (SEM; Shipley 2000a, Grace 2006). When the causal explanation does not involve unmeasured (latent) variables, this reduces to confirmatory path analysis.
However, many ecological phenomena are also inherently hierarchical or otherwise multilevel in nature; examples are when repeated measurements are taken on the same individuals, when observations are nested in different geographical areas, when individuals are nested in different species, and so on. Standard methods of testing path models based on maximum likelihood are difficult or even impossible to apply when data have such a hierarchical structure and when intercepts and path coefficients therefore potentially vary between hierarchical levels. Such problems are especially acute when different variables are measured at different hierarchical levels.
There are two alternative, but asymptotically equivalent, ways of conducting a confirmatory path analysis. Standard methods are based on a comparison between observed and predicted covariance matrices, such as those derived from maximum likelihood estimators. However, Shipley (2000a, b, 2003, 2004) derived a different, and more general, method of testing path models, based on the graph theoretic notion of “d‐separation” (directional separation; Pearl and Verma 1987, Geiger et al. 1990, Geiger and Pearl 1993, Pearl 2000) and on the relationship between d‐separation of a directed acyclic (i.e., causal) graph and conditional independence claims in the probability distribution generated by such a graph. The purpose of this note is to explain how such d‐sep tests of path models can be easily generalized to deal with data having a hierarchical structure; I will call these “generalized multilevel path models.” D‐sep tests of causal graphs describes the logic and mechanics of the d‐sep test. Generalized multilevel path models gives an ecological example of a simple generalized multilevel path model and shows how to test a model using d‐sep tests combined with the mechanics of generalized mixed model regression.
D‐sep Tests of Causal Graphs
A multivariate causal hypothesis consists of specifying how the variables are linked together in terms of direct and indirect causal effects. This gives rise to “box‐and‐arrow” diagrams familiar to ecologists, showing how causal effects should flow through the system. Fig. 1 shows a simple path model involving four measured variables and two sets of mutually independent residual causes (ε) of variables X3 and X4. In graph theory, such box‐and‐arrow diagrams are called directed graphs and, when there are no feedback relationships (A→B→C→A), they are called directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). Testing the causal structure of a multivariate causal hypothesis using observational data is therefore equivalent to testing the hypothetical cause–effect structure of a directed graph.

A multivariate causal hypothesis expressed as a directed acyclic graph involving four observed variables (X1 to X4) and unobserved causes (ε3, ε4) generating the residual variances X3 and X4.
A classical way of testing such a causal hypothesis is through a series of experimental manipulations, in which some variables are experimentally fixed to constant values, thus preventing them from changing in response to their normal causes. One would then deduce, given the causal hypothesis, which variables must be dependent or independent in their natural state and how these patterns of dependence and independence must change following the experimental control of other sets of variables. For example, the variables X1 and X2 in Fig. 1 are causally independent if we hold constant none of the other variables, i.e., {∅}; if we hold constant only variable X3, i.e., {3}; if we hold constant only variable X4, i.e., {4}; and if we simultaneously hold constant both variables X3 and X4, i.e., {3,4}. Symbolically, we would write down the following independence claims: (1, 2) | {∅}, (1, 2) | {3}, (1, 2) | {4}, (1, 2) | {3, 4}. In Fig. 1, we also see that variable X4 is causally dependent on the behavior of variable X1 if no physical controls are imposed because X1 causes X3 which then causes X4; symbolically, we would write down the following dependence claim: (1,4) | {∅}. However, if we were to physically prevent X3 from responding to changes in X1 (i.e., hold X3 constant) then the causal dependence of X4 on X1 would be removed; X1 and X4 would become independent conditional on X3 remaining constant. Symbolically, we would write down the following independence claim: (1, 4) | {3}. It is possible to write down all claims of dependence and independence that are logically implied by the hypothesized causal graph given in Fig. 1 and these are listed in Table 1 under the heading “Experimental control.”

A d‐sep (directional separation) test of a causal hypothesis follows the same logic as in the case of experimental controls except that experimental control is replaced with statistical control. Determining the dependence or independence of any two variables (X1, X2) after statistically holding constant some other variables {X3, … , Xn} consists of determining the dependence or independence of the residuals of X1 from the expected value of X1 given the values of {X3, … , Xn} and the residuals of X2 from the expected value of X2 given the values of {X3, … , Xn}. Tests of independence based on Pearson correlations or partial correlations or on the slopes of regressions or multiple regressions are particular examples of such statistical controls. Since statistical and experimental controls do not always give the same predictions of dependence or independence (Pearl 2000, Shipley 2000a), it is necessary to know how a causal hypothesis involving V variables (a directed acyclic graph) is translated into the N claims of statistical, as opposed to experimental, dependence or independence. This translation is given by a manipulation of the graph called “d‐separation.” Pearl (1988: theorem 10) proved that if two variables (X, Y) are d‐separated given a conditioning set Z of other variables in a directed acyclic graph then they must also be conditionally independent in any probability distribution that is generated by such a graph; Z can also be the empty {∅} set, meaning that no conditioning variables are used. Additionally, if the two variables are not d‐separated in the graph, then they cannot be conditionally independent in the resulting probability distribution. Therefore, applying d‐separation to the graph for each of the N independence claims gives us the complete description of the statistical patterns of conditional dependence and independence that must be true of any data generated by such a causal process; this applies independently of the nature of the variables, the functional form of the relationships between the variables (i.e., linear or nonlinear), or the type of multivariate probability distribution that is generated by the causal process. Table 1 also lists the N statistical independence claims associated with Fig. 1 and highlights in bold type those claims that differ between experimental and statistical control.

The basis set BU consists of each pair of variables (X, Y) in the graph that do not have an arrow between them (i.e., one is not a direct cause of the other) and the conditioning set {Z} for each such pair contains all variables that are direct causes of either X or Y (their “causal parents”). Thus, the basis set for Fig. 1 contains three independence claims: BU = {(X1, X2) | {∅}, (X1, X4) | {X3}, (X2, X4) | {X3}} that, together, imply all other claims of dependence or independence made by Fig. 1. The notation “(Xi, Xj) | {Z}” means that variables Xi and Xj are independent after conditioning on the variables in the set {Z}. In order to calculate the null probability (pi) for each of the k independence claims in the BU basis set, one must use a test of independence that is appropriate for each claim, based on the distributional properties of the variables in question. In this sense, a d‐sep test is very general. In the specific context of mixed‐model path analysis, this means that one must use tests of independence that are appropriate for the assumptions of the mixed model.
-
1) Express the hypothesized causal relationships between the variables in the form of a directed acyclic graph.
-
2) List each of the k pairs of variables in the graph that do not have an arrow between them.
-
3) For each of the k pairs of variables (Xi, Xj), list the set of other variables, {Z} in the graph that are direct causes of either Xi or Xj. The pair of variables (Xi, Xj) along with its conditioning set {Z} define an independence claim, (Xi, Xj) | {Z}, and the full set of the k independence claims defines the basis set BU.
-
4) For each element in this basis set, obtain the probability, pk, that the pair (Xi, Xj) is statistically independent conditional on the variables Z.
-
5) Combine the k probabilities using Eq. 2 and compare the resulting C value to a chi‐squared distribution with 2k degrees of freedom. Reject the causal model if the C value is unlikely to have occurred by chance (i.e., below the chosen significance level).
Generalized Multilevel Path Models
Consider a hypothetical study beginning in 1970 in which 20 sites are chosen differing in latitude (X1). Five individual trees of a particular species are chosen within each site. Each tree is followed every second year until 2006 or until it dies (thus, repeated measures). At each site, in each sample year, and for each living individual you measure the cumulative degree days until bud break (X2), the Julian date (day of year) of bud break (X3), the increase in stem diameter per tree (X4), and a binary variable indicating survival (1) or death (0) during the subsequent growing season (X5). Fig. 2 shows a hypothetical causal structure involving these five measured variables. Such a path model would be very difficult to test using standard structural unilevel equations models. First, there are three hierarchical levels (between sites, between individuals within sites, between years within individuals within sites) thus making observations nonindependent. Individuals growing in the same site will tend to respond similarly to many site‐specific characteristics besides those explicit in the model. Similarly, the repeated measures of the same individual will tend to respond similarly due to the many characteristics specific to that individual besides those explicit in the model. Second, because of this nested structure, the strength of the path coefficients could potentially vary between individuals and sites. Third, the different nature of the variables (binary for survival, continuous for the other variables) complicates testing the conditional independencies using correlations or covariances. Finally, different variables vary at different hierarchical levels; for example, “latitude” varies only between sites, “degree days” varies both between sites and between years but not between trees in the same site and year, while “growth” and “survival” varies between sites, between years and between trees. However, none of these complications affect the logic of the d‐sep test since one can test the different predicted conditional independencies using different tests of independence that are appropriate for the data.

A hypothetical causal process involving six observed variables (independent latent causes are not shown for simplicity). Latitude and year generate the number of degree‐days at each site. Degree‐days then cause the date of bud burst of a tree species. The date of bud burst causes the amount of diameter growth, and diameter growth determines the survival in the subsequent winter.
One can test each hypothesized conditional independency separately using a generalized mixed model, obtain a null probability separately for each, and then combine them using Eq. 2. This assumes that the appropriate functional form linking the variables can be expressed using a generalized mixed model. Given any d‐separation claim, for example (X, Y) | {A, B}, one would regress either X or Y on the set of conditioning variables (here A and B) plus the other variable in the pair, specifying the appropriate error distribution for the dependent variable (i.e., normal, Poisson, binomial, and so on) and also specifying the correct hierarchical structure of the data. Many statistical programs can fit mixed (or multilevel) models; here I use the lme or lmer functions in the nlme and lme4 packages of R (R Development Core Team 2008). One then obtains the probability that the partial slope of the dependent variable of the pair (either X or Y) is zero in the statistical population given the conditioning variables (here, A and B) since, if this is true, then X and Y are conditionally independent.
Fig. 3 shows a scatter plot matrix of data simulated from Fig. 2. Table 2 lists the BU basis set of Fig. 2, the associated mixed model regressions of each element of BU using the lmer function, the relevant partial regression slope whose value is predicted to be zero in the statistical population, and the null probability assuming the true partial regression slope is zero; note that the assumed sampling distribution will change depending on whether the dependent variable is normally distributed (all variables except for survival) or binomially distributed (survival). The Supplement gives the code to do this analysis. The C statistic (Eq. 2) is 9.53 with k = 12 degrees of freedom. The probability of observing this value by chance if the data were actually generated by the causal process (which they were) is 0.66, thus correctly preventing us from rejecting the model at a significance level of 0.05.

A simulated data set, generated according to the causal structure shown in Fig. 2, involving 20 sites and five trees per site. Each tree is measured every second year from 1970 until 2006 or until it dies. Variables are latitude (degrees), degree days (°C), bud burst (Julian days), growth (cm/yr), and alive (binary 0/1).
Fig. 4 shows an alternative (incorrect) causal hypothesis concerning these same data. The only difference is that in this incorrect hypothesis the date of budburst is not a cause of growth; rather, it is spuriously correlated with growth and survival because it shares a common cause with them (i.e., degree days). Table 3 lists the BU basis set of Fig. 4, the associated mixed‐model regressions of each element of BU, the relevant partial regression slope and its null probability assuming the true partial regression slope is zero. Note that two of the d‐sep claims in this incorrect model differ from those implied by the correct model. The C statistic for this incorrect model is 31.75 with k = 12 degrees of freedom. The probability of observing this value by chance if the data were actually generated by the causal process (they were not) is 0.002, thus correctly forcing us to reject the model at a significance level of 0.05.

An alternative causal explanation from that shown in Fig. 3.
Once a causal structure is obtained that is consistent both with the predicted patterns of direct and indirect statistical independence and with any other background information about the causal process, then the path coefficients can be obtained by fitting the series of mixed models that follow from the structure. This series of models is not the same as the one required in testing the model because the path coefficients are obtained by regressing each variable only on each of its direct causes.
The extension of the d‐sep test to a mixed‐model context, including complications beyond those illustrated here, is straightforward and can be implemented using standard statistical programs. For instance, models in which path coefficients vary between groups would have randomly varying slopes in the mixed model and some models with correlated error structures can also be accommodated (Shipley 2003). An empirical example is given in Thomas et al. (2007). Finally it is also possible to apply the method described in this paper to multilevel Bayesian (MCMC) models (McCarthy 2007) simply by testing independence of the (partial) slopes by determining the 95% credible intervals.
Acknowledgments
This study was financially supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. Partick Bergeron and Patrice Bourgault commented on an earlier version of this paper.
SUPPLEMENT
A text file and detailed instructions for implementing the statistical test using mixed model regressions in R (Ecological Archives E090‐028‐S1).
Literature Cited
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 331
- Belen Fadrique, Paul Santos-Andrade, William Farfan-Rios, Norma Salinas, Miles Silman, Kenneth J. Feeley, Reduced tree density and basal area in Andean forests are associated with bamboo dominance, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118648, 480, (118648), (2021).
- Fabrice Requier, Alice Fournier, Quentin Rome, Eric Darrouzet, Science communication is needed to inform risk perception and action of stakeholders, Journal of Environmental Management, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109983, 257, (109983), (2020).
- Chima J. Nwaogu, Annabet Galema, Will Cresswell, Maurine W. Dietz, B. Irene Tieleman, A fruit diet rather than invertebrate diet maintains a robust innate immunity in an omnivorous tropical songbird, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13152, 89, 3, (867-883), (2020).
- Andressa da Silva Reis, Míriam Pilz Albrecht, Stuart E. Bunn, Food web pathways for fish communities in small tropical streams, Freshwater Biology, 10.1111/fwb.13471, 65, 5, (893-907), (2020).
- Wentao Chen, Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Numerical methods for sedimentary‐ancient‐DNA‐based study on past biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, Environmental DNA, 10.1002/edn3.79, 2, 2, (115-129), (2020).
- Carolyn A. Eckrich, Shannon E. Albeke, Elizabeth A. Flaherty, R. Terry Bowyer, Merav Ben‐David, rKIN: Kernel‐based method for estimating isotopic niche size and overlap, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13159, 89, 3, (757-771), (2020).
- Josephine Goldstein, Ulrich K. Steiner, Ecological drivers of jellyfish blooms – The complex life history of a ‘well‐known’ medusa (Aurelia aurita), Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13147, 89, 3, (910-920), (2020).
- Raquel Juan-Ovejero, Rodrigo R. Granjel, Pablo Ramil-Rego, María Jesús Iglesias Briones, The interplay between abiotic factors and below-ground biological interactions regulates carbon exports from peatlands, Geoderma, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114313, 368, (114313), (2020).
- Jean-David Moore, Louis Duchesne, Rock Ouimet, Marie-Lou Deschênes, Liming improves sap characteristics of sugar maple over the long term, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118044, 464, (118044), (2020).
- Francesco Boscutti, Elisa Pellegrini, Valentino Casolo, Maria Nobili, Massimo Buccheri, Giorgio Alberti, Cascading effects from plant to soil elucidate how the invasive Amorpha fruticosa L. impacts dry grasslands, Journal of Vegetation Science, 10.1111/jvs.12879, 31, 4, (667-677), (2020).
- Guadalupe Peralta, Diego P. Vázquez, Natacha P. Chacoff, Silvia B. Lomáscolo, George L. W. Perry, Jason M. Tylianakis, Trait matching and phenological overlap increase the spatio‐temporal stability and functionality of plant–pollinator interactions, Ecology Letters, 10.1111/ele.13510, 23, 7, (1107-1116), (2020).
- Ben J.O. Robinson, David K.A. Barnes, Simon A. Morley, Disturbance, dispersal and marine assemblage structure: A case study from the nearshore Southern Ocean, Marine Environmental Research, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.105025, (105025), (2020).
- Théophile Olivier, Elisa Thébault, Marianne Elias, Benoit Fontaine, Colin Fontaine, Urbanization and agricultural intensification destabilize animal communities differently than diversity loss, Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-020-16240-6, 11, 1, (2020).
- Michelle Lisa Kiri Harrison, Cristina Banks‐Leite, Edge effects on trophic cascades in tropical rainforests, Conservation Biology, 10.1111/cobi.13438, 34, 4, (977-987), (2020).
- Semona Issa, Marlène Gamelon, Tomasz Maciej Ciesielski, Kristine Vike-Jonas, Alexandros G. Asimakopoulos, Veerle L. B. Jaspers, Sigurd Einum, Dopamine mediates life-history responses to food abundance in Daphnia , Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2020.1069, 287, 1930, (20201069), (2020).
- Andrés Tálamo, Javier Lopez de Casenave, Lucas A. Garibaldi, Mauricio Núñez-Regueiro, Direct and indirect relationships between logging intensity and regeneration of two timber species in the Dry Chaco of Argentina, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118343, 474, (118343), (2020).
- Jacob E. Allgeier, Mona A. Andskog, Enie Hensel, Richard Appaldo, Craig Layman, Dustin W. Kemp, Rewiring coral: Anthropogenic nutrients shift diverse coral–symbiont nutrient and carbon interactions toward symbiotic algal dominance, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.15230, 26, 10, (5588-5601), (2020).
- Amanda R. Bourne, Susan J. Cunningham, Claire N. Spottiswoode, Amanda R. Ridley, High temperatures drive offspring mortality in a cooperatively breeding bird, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2020.1140, 287, 1931, (20201140), (2020).
- Iván Darío Camargo, Toward a Unifying Quest for an Understanding of Tolerance Mechanisms to Herbivore Damage and Its Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics, Evolutionary Ecology of Plant-Herbivore Interaction, 10.1007/978-3-030-46012-9, (63-86), (2020).
- Marian Cabrera, Joost F. Duivenvoorden, Drivers of aboveground biomass of high mountain vegetation in the Andes, Acta Oecologica, 10.1016/j.actao.2019.103504, 102, (103504), (2020).
- Yoichi Tsuzuki, Tomoyo F. Koyanagi, Tadashi Miyashita, Plant community assembly in suburban vacant lots depends on earthmoving legacy, habitat connectivity, and current mowing frequency, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.5985, 10, 3, (1311-1323), (2020).
- Frédéric Dulude‐de Broin, Sandra Hamel, Gabriela F. Mastromonaco, Steeve D. Côté, Predation risk and mountain goat reproduction: Evidence for stress‐induced breeding suppression in a wild ungulate, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2435.13514, 34, 5, (1003-1014), (2020).
- Anselmo Nogueira, Fabricio B. Baccaro, Laura C. Leal, Pedro J. Rey, Lúcia G. Lohmann, Judith L. Bronstein, Variation in the production of plant tissues bearing extrafloral nectaries explains temporal patterns of ant attendance in Amazonian understorey plants, Journal of Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2745.13340, 108, 4, (1578-1591), (2020).
- Calum X. Cunningham, Christopher N. Johnson, Menna E. Jones, A native apex predator limits an invasive mesopredator and protects native prey: Tasmanian devils protecting bandicoots from cats, Ecology Letters, 10.1111/ele.13473, 23, 4, (711-721), (2020).
- Aidan M. Keith, Robert I. Griffiths, Peter A. Henrys, Steve Hughes, Inma Lebron, Lindsay C. Maskell, Stephen M. Ogle, David A. Robinson, Ed C. Rowe, Simon M. Smart, Dave Spurgeon, Claire M. Wood, Bridget A. Emmett, Monitoring Soil Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services by Using Large‐Scale Survey Data, Soil Ecosystems Services, undefined, (127-155), (2020).
- Hui Fu, Guixiang Yuan, Dabing Ge, Wei Li, Dongsheng Zou, Zhenrong Huang, Aiping Wu, Qiaolin Liu, Erik Jeppesen, Cascading effects of elevation, soil moisture and soil nutrients on plant traits and ecosystem multi-functioning in Poyang Lake wetland, China, Aquatic Sciences, 10.1007/s00027-020-0711-7, 82, 2, (2020).
- Robert W. Heckman, Albina R. Khasanova, Nicholas S. Johnson, Sören Weber, Jason E. Bonnette, Michael J. Aspinwall, Lara G. Reichmann, Thomas E. Juenger, Philip A. Fay, Christine V. Hawkes, Plant biomass, not plant economics traits, determines responses of soil CO2 efflux to precipitation in the C4 grass Panicum virgatum, Journal of Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2745.13382, 108, 5, (2095-2106), (2020).
- M. Gamberg, I. Pratte, J. Brammer, C. Cuyler, B. Elkin, K. Gurney, S. Kutz, N.C. Larter, D. Muir, X. Wang, J.F. Provencher, Renal trace elements in barren-ground caribou subpopulations: Temporal trends and differing effects of sex, age and season, Science of The Total Environment, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138305, 724, (138305), (2020).
- L. P. Waller, W. J. Allen, B. I. P. Barratt, L. M. Condron, F. M. França, J. E. Hunt, N. Koele, K. H. Orwin, G. S. Steel, J. M. Tylianakis, S. A. Wakelin, I. A. Dickie, Biotic interactions drive ecosystem responses to exotic plant invaders, Science, 10.1126/science.aba2225, 368, 6494, (967-972), (2020).
- Douglas E. Brash, Rethinking Causation for Data‐intensive Biology: Constraints, Cancellations, and Quantized Organisms, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.201900135, 42, 7, (2020).
- Antoine Dumont, Kevin Ho, Hao‐Ting Kung, Chenyue Qiu, Peicheng Li, Deying Luo, Yongbiao Zhao, Gilbert Walker, Zheng‐Hong Lu, Extraordinary Mass Transport and Self‐Assembly: A Pathway to Fabricate Luminescent CsPbBr3 and Light‐Emitting Diodes by Vapor‐Phase Deposition, Advanced Materials Interfaces, 10.1002/admi.202000506, 7, 13, (2020).
- Minzhi Yu, Sang Y. Kim, Emily E. Morin, Anna Schwendeman, Reply, Arthritis & Rheumatology, 10.1002/art.41237, 72, 7, (1234-1236), (2020).
- Madelon J. Logtenberg, Renate Akkerman, Ran An, Gerben D. A. Hermes, Bart J. Haan, Marijke M. Faas, Erwin G. Zoetendal, Henk A. Schols, Paul Vos, Fermentation of Chicory Fructo‐Oligosaccharides and Native Inulin by Infant Fecal Microbiota Attenuates Pro‐Inflammatory Responses in Immature Dendritic Cells in an Infant‐Age‐Dependent and Fructan‐Specific Way, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 10.1002/mnfr.202000068, 64, 13, (2020).
- Simon L. Porter, Sophie M. Coulter, Sreekanth Pentlavalli, Garry Laverty, Pharmaceutical Formulation and Characterization of Dipeptide Nanotubes for Drug Delivery Applications, Macromolecular Bioscience, 10.1002/mabi.202000115, 20, 7, (2020).
- Mohammed Yousuf Karim, Increased Awareness of Hypogammaglobulinemia After B Cell‐Targeted Therapy: Comment on the Article by Md Yusof et al, Arthritis & Rheumatology, 10.1002/art.41242, 72, 7, (1230-1231), (2020).
- Patricia Diez‐Echave, Teresa Vezza, Alba Rodríguez‐Nogales, Laura Hidalgo‐Garcia, José Garrido‐Mesa, Antonio Ruiz‐Malagon, Jose Alberto Molina‐Tijeras, Miguel Romero, Iñaki Robles‐Vera, Francisco Javier Leyva‐Jiménez, Jesús Lozano‐Sanchez, David Arráez‐Román, Antonio Segura‐Carretero, Vicente Micol, Federico García, Rocío Morón, Juan Duarte, Maria Elena Rodríguez‐Cabezas, Julio Gálvez, The Beneficial Effects of Lippia Citriodora Extract on Diet‐Induced Obesity in Mice Are Associated with Modulation in the Gut Microbiota Composition, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 10.1002/mnfr.202000005, 64, 13, (2020).
- Sebastian Becker, Pascal Klein, Alexander Gößling, Jochen Kuhn, Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes, Learning and Instruction, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350, 69, (101350), (2020).
- Gabin Piton, Arnaud Foulquier, Laura B. Martínez-García, Nicolas Legay, Katarina Hedlund, Pedro Martins da Silva, Eduardo Nascimento, Filipa Reis, Paulo Sousa, Gerlinde B. De Deyn, Jean Christophe Clement, Disentangling drivers of soil microbial potential enzyme activity across rain regimes: An approach based on the functional trait framework, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107881, (107881), (2020).
- Facundo X. Palacio, Adam M. Siepielski, Mariela V. Lacoretz, Mariano Ordano, Selection on fruit traits is mediated by the interplay between frugivorous birds, fruit flies, parasitoid wasps and seed‐dispersing ants, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.13656, 33, 7, (874-886), (2020).
- José Luiz Alves Silva, Alexandre Fadigas Souza, Louis Stephen Santiago, Anderson da Rocha Gripp, Ana Elizabeth Bonato Asato, Gabriel Henrique Santos Silva, Mery Ingrid Guimarães de Alencar, Adriano Caliman, Small biodiversity effects on leaf litter production of a seasonal heath vegetation, Journal of Vegetation Science, 10.1111/jvs.12908, 31, 5, (877-886), (2020).
- Christian R. Voolstra, Maren Ziegler, Adapting with Microbial Help: Microbiome Flexibility Facilitates Rapid Responses to Environmental Change, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.202000004, 42, 7, (2020).
- Erin E. Heyer, James Blackburn, Sequencing Strategies for Fusion Gene Detection, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.202000016, 42, 7, (2020).
- Andrew Moore, Conferences After COVID and Academics in Adversity: Physical Globalization is Fragile, But so Too is Internet Neutrality, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.202000137, 42, 7, (2020).
- Antony M. Jose, Heritable Epigenetic Changes Alter Transgenerational Waveforms Maintained by Cycling Stores of Information, BioEssays, 10.1002/bies.201900254, 42, 7, (2020).
- Candice Y Lumibao, Elizabeth R Kimbrough, Richard H Day, William H Conner, Ken W Krauss, Sunshine A Van Bael, Divergent biotic and abiotic filtering of root endosphere and rhizosphere soil fungal communities along ecological gradients, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 10.1093/femsec/fiaa124, 96, 7, (2020).
- Amélie Paoli, Robert B. Weladji, Øystein Holand, Jouko Kumpula, Response of reindeer mating time to climatic variability, BMC Ecology, 10.1186/s12898-020-00312-8, 20, 1, (2020).
- Côme Denechaud, Szymon Smoliński, Audrey J. Geffen, Jane A. Godiksen, Steven E. Campana, A century of fish growth in relation to climate change, population dynamics and exploitation, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.15298, 26, 10, (5661-5678), (2020).
- Johan S. Eklöf, Göran Sundblad, Mårten Erlandsson, Serena Donadi, Joakim P. Hansen, Britas Klemens Eriksson, Ulf Bergström, A spatial regime shift from predator to prey dominance in a large coastal ecosystem, Communications Biology, 10.1038/s42003-020-01180-0, 3, 1, (2020).
- Juliano A. Bogoni, Carlos A. Peres, Katia M. P. M. B. Ferraz, Extent, intensity and drivers of mammal defaunation: a continental-scale analysis across the Neotropics, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/s41598-020-72010-w, 10, 1, (2020).
- Tsunenori Saito, Kuniya Asai, Masaki Tachi, Shigeru Sato, Kosuke Mozawa, Akiko Adachi, Yoshihiro Sasaki, Yasuo Amano, Kyoichi Mizuno, Shin‐ichiro Kumita, Wataru Shimizu, Long‐term prognostic value of ultrastructural features in dilated cardiomyopathy: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance, ESC Heart Failure, 10.1002/ehf2.12662, 7, 2, (682-691), (2020).
- Taylor Woods, Lise Comte, Pablo A. Tedesco, Xingli Giam, Testing the diversity–biomass relationship in riverine fish communities, Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10.1111/geb.13147, 29, 10, (1743-1757), (2020).
- Stefan Lüpold, Jonathan Bradley Reil, Mollie K. Manier, Valérian Zeender, John M. Belote, Scott Pitnick, How female × male and male × male interactions influence competitive fertilization in Drosophila melanogaster, Evolution Letters, 10.1002/evl3.193, 4, 5, (416-429), (2020).
- Angela A.Q. Chan, Cristina Banks-Leite, Habitat modification mediates the strength of trophic cascades on oak trees, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 10.1016/j.pecon.2020.09.002, (2020).
- Thomas Püttker, Renato Crouzeilles, Mauricio Almeida-Gomes, Marina Schmoeller, Daniel Maurenza, Helena Alves-Pinto, Renata Pardini, Marcus V. Vieira, Cristina Banks-Leite, Carlos R. Fonseca, Jean Paul Metzger, Gustavo M. Accacio, Eduardo R. Alexandrino, Camila S. Barros, Juliano A. Bogoni, Danilo Boscolo, Pedro H.S. Brancalion, Adriana A. Bueno, Elaine C.B. Cambui, Gustavo R. Canale, Rui Cerqueira, Ricardo G. Cesar, Gabriel D. Colletta, Ana C. Delciellos, Marianna Dixo, Candelaria Estavillo, Carolina F. Esteves, Fábio Falcão, Fabiano T. Farah, Deborah Faria, Katia M.P.M.B. Ferraz, Silvio F.B. Ferraz, Patricia A. Ferreira, Mauricio E. Graipel, Carlos E.V. Grelle, Malva I.M. Hernández, Natalia Ivanauskas, Rudi R. Laps, Inara R. Leal, Marilia M. Lima, Marilia B. Lion, Marcelo Magioli, Luiz F.S. Magnago, Julia R.A.S. Mangueira, Euvaldo Marciano-Jr, Eduardo Mariano-Neto, Marcia C.M. Marques, Sebastião V. Martins, Marlla A. Matos, Fabio A.R. Matos, Jeanette I. Miachir, José M. Morante-Filho, Natalie Olifiers, Luiz G.R. Oliveira-Santos, Mateus L.B. Paciencia, Adriano P. Paglia, Marcelo Passamani, Carlos A. Peres, Clarissa M. Pinto Leite, Tiago J. Porto, Luciano C.A. Querido, Luciana C. Reis, Andréia A. Rezende, Dary M.G. Rigueira, Pedro L.B. Rocha, Larissa Rocha-Santos, Ricardo R. Rodrigues, Rafael A.S. Santos, Juliana S. Santos, Maxwell S. Silveira, Marcelo Simonelli, Marcelo Tabarelli, Rodrigo N. Vasconcelos, Blandina F. Viana, M. Vieira Emerson, Jayme A. Prevedello, Indirect effects of habitat loss via habitat fragmentation: A cross-taxa analysis of forest-dependent species, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368, 241, (108368), (2020).
- Vani Ramesh, Vishal Chandr Jaunky, Public awareness and perception towards conservation of Mauritian Flying Fox (Pteropus niger): Structural equation modelling, Materials Today: Proceedings, 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.703, (2020).
- Fabrice Requier, Kim K. Jowanowitsch, Katharina Kallnik, Ingolf Steffan‐Dewenter, Limitation of complementary resources affects colony growth, foraging behavior, and reproduction in bumble bees, Ecology, 10.1002/ecy.2946, 101, 3, (2020).
- Bill Shipley, Jacob C. Douma, Generalized AIC and chi‐squared statistics for path models consistent with directed acyclic graphs, Ecology, 10.1002/ecy.2960, 101, 3, (2020).
- David C. Deane, Pembegul Nozohourmehrabad, Scott S.D. Boyce, Fangliang He, Quantifying factors for understanding why several small patches host more species than a single large patch, Biological Conservation, 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108711, 249, (108711), (2020).
- Enrique Valencia, Francesco de Bello, Thomas Galland, Peter B. Adler, Jan Lepš, Anna E-Vojtkó, Roel van Klink, Carlos P. Carmona, Jiří Danihelka, Jürgen Dengler, David J. Eldridge, Marc Estiarte, Ricardo García-González, Eric Garnier, Daniel Gómez‐García, Susan P. Harrison, Tomáš Herben, Ricardo Ibáñez, Anke Jentsch, Norbert Juergens, Miklós Kertész, Katja Klumpp, Frédérique Louault, Rob H. Marrs, Romà Ogaya, Gábor Ónodi, Robin J. Pakeman, Iker Pardo, Meelis Pärtel, Begoña Peco, Josep Peñuelas, Richard F. Pywell, Marta Rueda, Wolfgang Schmidt, Ute Schmiedel, Martin Schuetz, Hana Skálová, Petr Šmilauer, Marie Šmilauerová, Christian Smit, MingHua Song, Martin Stock, James Val, Vigdis Vandvik, David Ward, Karsten Wesche, Susan K. Wiser, Ben A. Woodcock, Truman P. Young, Fei-Hai Yu, Martin Zobel, Lars Götzenberger, Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1920405117, 117, 39, (24345-24351), (2020).
- Hui Fu, Guixiang Yuan, Korhan Özkan, Liselotte Sander Johansson, Martin Søndergaard, Torben L. Lauridsen, Erik Jeppesen, Seasonal and long-term trends in the spatial heterogeneity of lake phytoplankton communities over two decades of restoration and climate change, Science of The Total Environment, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141106, 748, (141106), (2020).
- Serena Donadi, Lena Bergström, Johnny Mats Bertil Berglund, Bäck Anette, Roosa Mikkola, Anniina Saarinen, Ulf Bergström, Perch and pike recruitment in coastal bays limited by stickleback predation and environmental forcing, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 10.1016/j.ecss.2020.107052, (107052), (2020).
- Y. Ivón Pelliza, C.P. Souto, M. Tadey, Unravelling effects of grazing intensity on genetic diversity and fitness of desert vegetation, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 10.1016/j.pecon.2020.06.005, (2020).
- Daniel Augusto da Silva, Marion Pfeifer, Zarah Pattison, Alexander Christian Vibrans, Drivers of leaf area index variation in Brazilian Subtropical Atlantic Forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118477, 476, (118477), (2020).
- Nian-Feng Wan, Xiang-Rong Zheng, Li-Wan Fu, Lars Pødenphant Kiær, Zhijie Zhang, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Matteo Dainese, Jiaqi Tan, Shi-Yun Qiu, Yue-Qing Hu, Wei-Dong Tian, Ming Nie, Rui-Ting Ju, Jian-Yu Deng, Jie-Xian Jiang, You-Ming Cai, Bo Li, Global synthesis of effects of plant species diversity on trophic groups and interactions, Nature Plants, 10.1038/s41477-020-0654-y, (2020).
- X. Y. Li, W. V. Bleisch, X. W. Liu, W. Q. Hu, X. L. Jiang, Human disturbance and prey occupancy as predictors of carnivore richness and biomass in a Himalayan hotspot, Animal Conservation, 10.1111/acv.12600, 0, 0, (2020).
- Panagiotis Theodorou, Lucie M. Baltz, Robert J. Paxton, Antonella Soro, Urbanization is associated with shifts in bumblebee body size, with cascading effects on pollination, Evolutionary Applications, 10.1111/eva.13087, 0, 0, (2020).
- Andi Zulfikar, Mennofatria Boer, Luky Adrianto, Reny Puspasari, Kajian Hubungan Allometrik dan Biomassa Lamun Thalassia hemprichii sebagai Bioindikator Lingkungan, Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 10.18343/jipi.25.3.356, 25, 3, (356-364), (2020).
- Gabriel Gatica, Adrián Escudero, Eduardo Pucheta, Livestock settlement affects shrub abundance via plant functional diversity but not species richness in arid environments, Plant Ecology, 10.1007/s11258-020-01079-0, (2020).
- Anita C. Risch, Stefan Zimmermann, Barbara Moser, Martin Schütz, Frank Hagedorn, Jennifer Firn, Philip A. Fay, Peter B. Adler, Lori A. Biederman, John M. Blair, Elizabeth T. Borer, Arthur A. D. Broadbent, Cynthia S. Brown, Marc W. Cadotte, Maria C. Caldeira, Kendi F. Davies, Augustina Virgilio, Nico Eisenhauer, Anu Eskelinen, Johannes M. H. Knops, Andrew S. MacDougall, Rebecca L. McCulley, Brett A. Melbourne, Joslin L. Moore, Sally A. Power, Suzanne M. Prober, Eric W. Seabloom, Julia Siebert, Maria L. Silveira, Karina L. Speziale, Carly J. Stevens, Pedro M. Tognetti, Risto Virtanen, Laura Yahdjian, Raul Ochoa‐Hueso, Global impacts of fertilization and herbivore removal on soil net nitrogen mineralization are modulated by local climate and soil properties, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.15308, 0, 0, (2020).
- Friedrich Wolfgang Keppeler, Kirk O. Winemiller, Incorporating indirect pathways in body size–trophic position relationships, Oecologia, 10.1007/s00442-020-04752-3, (2020).
- Leonardo H. Teixeira, Florencia A. Yannelli, Gislene Ganade, Johannes Kollmann, Functional Diversity and Invasive Species Influence Soil Fertility in Experimental Grasslands, Plants, 10.3390/plants9010053, 9, 1, (53), (2020).
- Brett M. Taylor, Mark Chinkin, Mark G. Meekan, Teleconnections reveal that drivers of inter-annual growth can vary from local to ocean basin scales in tropical snappers, Coral Reefs, 10.1007/s00338-020-01903-z, (2020).
- Daniel Kozák, Marek Svitok, Michal Wiezik, Martin Mikoláš, Simon Thorn, Arne Buechling, Jeňýk Hofmeister, Radim Matula, Volodymyr Trotsiuk, Radek Bače, Krešimir Begovič, Vojtěch Čada, Martin Dušátko, Michal Frankovič, Jakub Horák, Pavel Janda, Ondrej Kameniar, Thomas A. Nagel, Joseph L. Pettit, Jessika M. Pettit, Michal Synek, Adela Wieziková, Miroslav Svoboda, Historical Disturbances Determine Current Taxonomic, Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity of Saproxylic Beetle Communities in Temperate Primary Forests, Ecosystems, 10.1007/s10021-020-00502-x, (2020).
- Benjamin Andrieux, David Paré, Julien Beguin, Pierre Grondin, Yves Bergeron, Boreal-forest soil chemistry drives soil organic carbon bioreactivity along a 314-year fire chronosequence, SOIL, 10.5194/soil-6-195-2020, 6, 1, (195-213), (2020).
- A. van Westreenen, N. Zhang, J. C. Douma, J. B. Evers, N. P. R. Anten, L. F. M. Marcelis, Substantial differences occur between canopy and ambient climate: Quantification of interactions in a greenhouse-canopy system, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0233210, 15, 5, (e0233210), (2020).
- Anudeep Yekula, Koushik Muralidharan, Zachary S. Rosh, Anna E. Youngkin, Keiko M. Kang, Leonora Balaj, Bob S. Carter, Liquid Biopsy Strategies to Distinguish Progression from Pseudoprogression and Radiation Necrosis in Glioblastomas, Advanced Biosystems, 10.1002/adbi.202000029, 0, 0, (2020).
- Jinyue Bai, Mingming Zong, Shiyu Li, Haixia Li, Changqun Duan, Yuan Feng, Changhui Peng, Xiaoling Zhang, Di Sun, Chen Lin, Yucheng Shi, Guangyu Zheng, Haidong Wang, Daxiang Liu, Fengrui Li, Wuping Huang, Nitrogen, water content, phosphorus and active iron jointly regulate soil organic carbon in tropical acid red soil forest, European Journal of Soil Science, 10.1111/ejss.12966, 0, 0, (2020).
- Surya K. Tripathi, Kamal Pandey, Kannan R. R. Rengasamy, Bijesh K. Biswal, Recent updates on the resistance mechanisms to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and resistance reversion strategies in lung cancer, Medicinal Research Reviews, 10.1002/med.21700, 0, 0, (2020).
- Tongai G. Maponga, Tatum Lopes, Russell Cable, Charlotte Pistorius, Wolfgang Preiser, Monique I. Andersson, Prevalence and risks of hepatitis E virus infection in blood donors from the Western Cape, South Africa, Vox Sanguinis, 10.1111/vox.12966, 0, 0, (2020).
- Rui Yin, Julia Siebert, Nico Eisenhauer, Martin Schädler, Climate change and intensive land use reduce soil animal biomass via dissimilar pathways, eLife, 10.7554/eLife.54749, 9, (2020).
- Léa Beaumelle, Frederik De Laender, Nico Eisenhauer, Biodiversity mediates the effects of stressors but not nutrients on litter decomposition, eLife, 10.7554/eLife.55659, 9, (2020).
- Ben A. Wasserman, Antoine Paccard, Travis M. Apgar, Simone Des Roches, Rowan D. H. Barrett, Andrew P. Hendry, Eric P. Palkovacs, Ecosystem size shapes antipredator trait evolution in estuarine threespine stickleback, Oikos, 10.1111/oik.07482, 0, 0, (2020).
- Tina A. Barbasch, Theresa Rueger, Maya Srinivasan, Marian Y. L. Wong, Geoffrey P. Jones, Peter M. Buston, Substantial plasticity of reproduction and parental care in response to local resource availability in a wild clownfish population, Oikos, 10.1111/oik.07674, 0, 0, (2020).
- Fia Bengtsson, Håkan Rydin, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Luca Bragazza, Zhao‐Jun Bu, Simon J. M. Caporn, Ellen Dorrepaal, Kjell Ivar Flatberg, Olga Galanina, Mariusz Gałka, Anna Ganeva, Irina Goia, Nadezhda Goncharova, Michal Hájek, Akira Haraguchi, Lorna I. Harris, Elyn Humphreys, Martin Jiroušek, Katarzyna Kajukało, Edgar Karofeld, Natalia G. Koronatova, Natalia P. Kosykh, Anna M. Laine, Mariusz Lamentowicz, Elena Lapshina, Juul Limpens, Maiju Linkosalmi, Jin‐Ze Ma, Marguerite Mauritz, Edward A. D. Mitchell, Tariq M. Munir, Susan M. Natali, Rayna Natcheva, Richard J. Payne, Dmitriy A. Philippov, Steven K. Rice, Sean Robinson, Bjorn J. M. Robroek, Line Rochefort, David Singer, Hans K. Stenøien, Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila, Kai Vellak, James Michael Waddington, Gustaf Granath, Environmental drivers of Sphagnum growth in peatlands across the Holarctic region, Journal of Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2745.13499, 0, 0, (2020).
- X. J. Walker, B. M. Rogers, S. Veraverbeke, J. F. Johnstone, J. L. Baltzer, K. Barrett, L. Bourgeau-Chavez, N. J. Day, W. J. de Groot, C. M. Dieleman, S. Goetz, E. Hoy, L. K. Jenkins, E. S. Kane, M.-A. Parisien, S. Potter, E. A. G. Schuur, M. Turetsky, E. Whitman, M. C. Mack, Fuel availability not fire weather controls boreal wildfire severity and carbon emissions, Nature Climate Change, 10.1038/s41558-020-00920-8, (2020).
- Claire‐Cécile Juhasz, Bill Shipley, Gilles Gauthier, Dominique Berteaux, Nicolas Lecomte, Direct and indirect effects of regional and local climatic factors on trophic interactions in the Arctic tundra, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13104, 89, 3, (704-715), (2019).
- Alicia Valdés, Jonathan Lenoir, Pieter De Frenne, Emilie Andrieu, Jörg Brunet, Olivier Chabrerie, Sara A. O. Cousins, Marc Deconchat, Pallieter De Smedt, Martin Diekmann, Steffen Ehrmann, Emilie Gallet‐Moron, Stefanie Gärtner, Brice Giffard, Karin Hansen, Martin Hermy, Annette Kolb, Vincent Le Roux, Jaan Liira, Jessica Lindgren, Ludmilla Martin, Tobias Naaf, Taavi Paal, Willem Proesmans, Michael Scherer‐Lorenzen, Monika Wulf, Kris Verheyen, Guillaume Decocq, High ecosystem service delivery potential of small woodlands in agricultural landscapes, Journal of Applied Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2664.13537, 57, 1, (4-16), (2019).
- Olivia M. Smith, Christina M. Kennedy, Jeb P. Owen, Tobin D. Northfield, Christopher E. Latimer, William E. Snyder, Highly diversified crop–livestock farming systems reshape wild bird communities, Ecological Applications, 10.1002/eap.2031, 30, 2, (2019).
- Henni Ylänne, Elina Kaarlejärvi, Maria Väisänen, Minna K. Männistö, Saija H. K. Ahonen, Johan Olofsson, Sari Stark, Removal of grazers alters the response of tundra soil carbon to warming and enhanced nitrogen availability, Ecological Monographs, 10.1002/ecm.1396, 90, 1, (2019).
- Judith Prommer, Tom W. N. Walker, Wolfgang Wanek, Judith Braun, David Zezula, Yuntao Hu, Florian Hofhansl, Andreas Richter, Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.14777, 26, 2, (669-681), (2019).
- Kate Layton‐Matthews, Brage Bremset Hansen, Vidar Grøtan, Eva Fuglei, Maarten J. J. E. Loonen, Contrasting consequences of climate change for migratory geese: Predation, density dependence and carryover effects offset benefits of high‐arctic warming, Global Change Biology, 10.1111/gcb.14773, 26, 2, (642-657), (2019).
- Jennifer J. Uehling, Conor C. Taff, David W. Winkler, Maren N. Vitousek, Developmental temperature predicts the adult response to stressors in a free‐living passerine, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13137, 89, 3, (842-854), (2019).
- Christopher J. Henderson, Ben L. Gilby, Thomas A. Schlacher, Rod M. Connolly, Marcus Sheaves, Paul S. Maxwell, Nicole Flint, Hayden P. Borland, Tyson S. H. Martin, Andrew D. Olds, Low redundancy and complementarity shape ecosystem functioning in a low‐diversity ecosystem, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13148, 89, 3, (784-794), (2019).
- Denon Start, Matthew A. Barbour, Colin Bonner, Urbanization reshapes a food web, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/1365-2656.13136, 89, 3, (808-816), (2019).
- Heather T. Root, Jesse E. D. Miller, Roger Rosentreter, Grazing disturbance promotes exotic annual grasses by degrading soil biocrust communities, Ecological Applications, 10.1002/eap.2016, 30, 1, (2019).
- María Laura Moreno, María Laura Bernaschini, Natalia Pérez‐Harguindeguy, Angela Lomba, Graciela Valladares, Chaco forest fragmentation effects on leaf litter decomposition are not explained by changes in litter fauna, Austral Ecology, 10.1111/aec.12824, 45, 1, (27-34), (2019).
- Pedro G. Vaz, Miguel N. Bugalho, José M. Fedriani, Manuela Branco, Xavier Lecomte, Carla Nogueira, Maria C. Caldeira, Unravelling associations between tree-seedling performance, herbivory, competition, and facilitation in high nature value farmlands, Journal of Environmental Management, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.082, 232, (1066-1074), (2019).
- Michael G. Walsh, Ecological and life history traits are associated with Ross River virus infection among sylvatic mammals in Australia, BMC Ecology, 10.1186/s12898-019-0220-5, 19, 1, (2019).
- Maïté S. Guignard, Michael J. Crawley, Dasha Kovalenko, Richard A. Nichols, Mark Trimmer, Andrew R. Leitch, Ilia J. Leitch, Interactions between plant genome size, nutrients and herbivory by rabbits, molluscs and insects on a temperate grassland, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.2018.2619, 286, 1899, (20182619), (2019).
- Daan Dekeukeleire, Irene M. van Schrojenstein Lantman, Lionel R. Hertzog, Martijn L. Vandegehuchte, Diederik Strubbe, Pieter Vantieghem, An Martel, Kris Verheyen, Dries Bonte, Luc Lens, Avian top-down control affects invertebrate herbivory and sapling growth more strongly than overstorey species composition in temperate forest fragments, Forest Ecology and Management, 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.055, 442, (1-9), (2019).
- See more





